Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core) vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
n/a
out 100
VS
72
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core), vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 207 146 140 104 |
 The Witcher 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 225 190 142 72 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 292 216 165 85 |
 Far Cry 6 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 164 149 136 85 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 143 120 96 55 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 191 187 144 100 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 130 110 96 58 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 175 151 107 48 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 263 247 196 104 |
| 1080p High | n/a | 199 |
| 1080p Ultra | n/a | 168 |
| 1440p Ultra | n/a | 136 |
| 4K Ultra | n/a | 79 |
| Deviation | n/a | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | n/a | 24225 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 116030 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 15768 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 56271 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 174807 |
| Background Blur | n/a | 331.7 frames/s |
| Face Detection | n/a | 211.6 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | n/a | 9.63 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | n/a | 13.7 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | n/a | 13.9 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | n/a | 2.15 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | n/a | 1210 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | n/a | 33566 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | n/a | 1218 |
| DirectX 11 | n/a | 280 fps |
| DirectX 12 | n/a | 117 fps |
| GPU Compute | n/a | 18522 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | n/a | 1300.6 fps |
| Car Chase | n/a | 1119.6 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | n/a | 943.4 fps |
| T-Rex | n/a | 4724.8 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 8528.7 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 289.1 fps |
| API | n/a | OpenGL |
| OS | n/a | Windows |
| Tessellation | n/a | 8597.7 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Apple | Nvidia |
| Build | Integrated | Discrete |
| Announced | May, 1, 2025 | January, 24, 2024 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | PC use |
| Use case | Professional | Gaming |
| Segment | High-end | High-end |
| Architecture | Apple M GPU | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | Custom | AD103 |
| Price | n/a | 799 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 2340 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2610 MHz |
| Shader Units | 10240 | 8448 |
| TMUs | 640 | 264 |
| ROPs | 320 | 96 |
| Execution Units | 1280 | 66 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | n/a | 66 |
| Tensor Cores | n/a | 264 |
| L1 cache | n/a | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | n/a | 48000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 576 Gpix/sec | 251 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 1152 GTex/s | 689 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 36.9 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | Custom | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 120 W | 285 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 379 mm² |
| Transistor count | n/a | 45 billion |
| Transistor density | n/a | 118.73 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Frequency | 8533 MHz | 1313 MHz |
| Bus | 1024 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | n/a | 21000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | n/a | 16 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | n/a | 4.6 |
| CUDA | n/a | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | n/a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
