Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core) vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090

Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core), vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core) and Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
332
242
231
183
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
366
338
234
127
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
379
271
209
98
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
235
202
198
124
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
244
210
167
96
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
337
333
269
184
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
221
190
170
114
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
259
231
166
77
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
334
306
238
128
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a301
1080p Ultran/a258
1440p Ultran/a209
4K Ultran/a126
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
25937
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
54096
Time Spyn/a47515
Solar Bayn/a213229
Port Royaln/a37529
Fire Striken/a90200
Night Raidn/a209016
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
218394
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
419309
Background Blurn/a333 frames/s
Face Detectionn/a298.5 frames/s
Horizon Detectionn/a21.7 Gpix/sec
Edge Detectionn/a33.7 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blurn/a34.5 Gpix/sec
Feature Matchingn/a2.53 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matchingn/a2850 Gpix/sec
Particle Physicsn/a59146.9 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
40359
G2D Markn/a1444
DirectX 11n/a344 fps
DirectX 12n/a195 fps
GPU Computen/a28243 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
624.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a1397.2 fps
Car Chasen/a1150.3 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a1178.2 fps
T-Rexn/a4812.3 fps
ALU 2n/a5992.8 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a269.7 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a5991.7

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Apple Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced May, 1, 2025 January, 7, 2025
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Professional Gaming
Segment High-end High-end
Architecture Apple M GPU Blackwell 2.0
Codename Custom GB202-300-A1
Price n/a 1999

GPU

GPU Frequency 500 MHz 2017 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800 MHz 2407 MHz
Shader Units 10240 21760
TMUs 640 680
ROPs 320 176
Execution Units 1280 170
Ray Tracing Cores n/a 170
Tensor Cores n/a 680
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 88 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 576 Gpix/sec 424 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 1152 GTex/s 1637 GTex/s
FLOPS 36.9 TFLOPS 104.8 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Custom PCIe 5.0 x16
TGP 120 W 575 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 3 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size n/a 750 mm²
Transistor count n/a 92.2 billion
Transistor density n/a 122.93 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR7
Memory Frequency 8533 MHz 1750 MHz
Bus 1024 bit 512 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 28000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 32 GB
Max Throughput
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
1792 GB/s

API

DirectX n/a 12
Vulkan n/a 1.4
OpenGL n/a 4.6
CUDA n/a 10.1
DisplayPort n/a 2.1a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 4

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below