Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
21
12
n/a
n/a
56
31
27
14
The Witcher 3
16
13
9
n/a
43
37
24
11
Counter-Strike 2
38
22
15
n/a
77
53
37
14
Far Cry 6
24
25
15
n/a
45
40
26
15
Hogwarts Legacy
15
11
10
n/a
24
18
16
9
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
24
14
11
38
28
21
13
Ghost of Tsushima
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
26
15
15
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
25
24
14
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
23
16
12
n/a
50
46
26
14
Avg FPS
1080p High2143
1080p Ultra1532
1440p Ultra1123
4K Ultra-11
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
1831
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3491
Time Spy17353675
Fire Strike677110078
Night Raid2704542270
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
20580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
47056
Background Blur52.5 frames/s83.5 frames/s
Face Detection24.9 frames/s45.7 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.79 Gpix/sec1.77 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.16 Gpix/sec2.32 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.25 Gpix/sec2.28 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.2 Gpix/sec0.62 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching65.5 Gpix/sec204.1 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics1832.4 fps5954.3 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
5028
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
7537
G2D Mark457381
DirectX 1138 fps61 fps
DirectX 1220 fps33 fps
GPU Compute2089 Ops/s2733 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
30 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
n/a
Aztec Ruins (Normal)174.9 fpsn/a
Car Chase160.4 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)143.1 fpsn/a
T-Rex650.7 fpsn/a
ALU 2631.8 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2231 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLn/a
OSWindowsn/a
Tessellation759.5n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced October, 25, 2016 April, 2, 2020
Form Factor PC use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Pascal Turing
Codename GP107 TU117 (N18P-G62)
Price 109 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 1354 MHz 1350 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1455 MHz 1485 MHz
Shader Units 640 1024
TMUs 40 64
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 5 16
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 48 KB/core 64 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 1000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 47 Gpix/sec 48 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 58 GTex/s 95 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.9 TFLOPS 3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 75 W 50 W
Process Samsung TSMC
Process tech. 14 nm 12 nm
Transistor Size 132 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor count 3 billion 4.7 billion
Transistor density 22.73 MTr/mm² 23.5 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 1752 MHz 1500 MHz
Bus 128 bit 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 7000 MB/s 12000 MB/s
Memory Size 2 GB 4 GB
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
112.1 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
192 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 6.1 7.5
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below