Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs AMD Radeon 760M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, vs AMD Radeon 760M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and AMD Radeon 760M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
52
31
23
14
44
21
18
9
The Witcher 3
40
31
19
10
21
17
10
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
71
51
34
13
40
25
18
9
Far Cry 6
43
39
26
14
33
25
17
9
Hogwarts Legacy
23
20
14
n/a
18
13
10
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
33
30
18
12
30
28
17
11
Ghost of Tsushima
22
15
13
n/a
18
11
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
25
20
12
n/a
19
16
9
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
43
41
24
13
27
23
13
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High3928
1080p Ultra3120
1440p Ultra2014
4K Ultra11-
DeviationLowMedium

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3247
AMD Radeon 760M
2105
Time Spy34432414
Solar Bayn/a9608
Port Royal6905970
Fire Strike93057232
Night Raid4040828004
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
40588
AMD Radeon 760M
22589
Background Blur74.4 frames/s57.8 frames/s
Face Detection42 frames/s28.7 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.47 Gpix/sec0.8 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.93 Gpix/sec1 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.81 Gpix/sec0.82 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.52 Gpix/sec0.29 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching187 Gpix/sec85.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5347.1 fps2844.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
6968
AMD Radeon 760M
5640
G2D Mark384900
DirectX 1150 fps56 fps
DirectX 1227 fps26 fps
GPU Compute2750 Ops/s3005 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
47.5 fps
AMD Radeon 760M
23.1 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)251.1 fps125.5 fps
Car Chase240.5 fps132.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)200.6 fps106.9 fps
T-Rex931.9 fps463 fps
ALU 21021.5 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2270.6 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1151.2n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced April, 15, 2020 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Turing RDNA 3.0
Codename TU117 Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 1380 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1560 MHz 2600-2800 MHz
Shader Units 1024 512
TMUs 64 32
ROPs 32 16
Execution Units 16 8
Ray Tracing Cores No 6
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache 64 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 50 Gpix/sec 42-45 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 100 GTex/s 83-90 GTex/s
FLOPS 3.2 TFLOPS 2.7-2.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 50 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 12 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size 200 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 4.7 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 23.5 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Frequency 1500 MHz n/a
Bus 128 bit n/a
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 12000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 4 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
192 GB/s
AMD Radeon 760M
n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below