Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
71
43
32
21
54
31
23
14
The Witcher 3
63
50
31
18
41
35
22
11
Counter-Strike 2
105
72
48
19
74
54
35
13
Far Cry 6
57
49
35
19
44
42
28
14
Hogwarts Legacy
34
27
22
11
24
20
14
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
41
36
25
18
37
31
18
12
Ghost of Tsushima
31
21
20
10
24
18
13
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
34
32
19
n/a
26
22
13
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
60
54
35
17
47
42
27
14
Avg FPS
1080p High5541
1080p Ultra4333
1440p Ultra3021
4K Ultra1611
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4388
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
3419
Time Spy46933565
Solar Bayn/a12312
Fire Strike122589684
Night Raid5993846016
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
57455
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
39481
Background Blur106.6 frames/s66.4 frames/s
Face Detection58.3 frames/s43.3 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.98 Gpix/sec1.51 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection2.67 Gpix/sec1.68 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.79 Gpix/sec1.87 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.75 Gpix/sec0.49 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching248.2 Gpix/sec187.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics7783.2 fps5261.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
10176
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
7880
G2D Mark750565
DirectX 1173 fps58 fps
DirectX 1244 fps35 fps
GPU Compute4516 Ops/s3058 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
54.3 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
47.5 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)305.2 fps251.1 fps
Car Chase280 fps240.5 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)260.1 fps200.6 fps
T-Rex1232.9 fps931.9 fps
ALU 21419.9 fps1021.5 fps
Driver Overhead 2284.6 fps270.6 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1564.41151.2

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced April, 23, 2019 April, 23, 2019
Form Factor PC use PC use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Turing Turing
Codename TU116 TU117
Price 159 149

GPU

GPU Frequency 1530 MHz 1485 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1725 MHz 1665 MHz
Shader Units 1280 896
TMUs 80 56
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 20 14
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 64 KB/core 64 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 55 Gpix/sec 53 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 138 GTex/s 93 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.4 TFLOPS 3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 100 W 75 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 12 nm 12 nm
Transistor Size 284 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor count 6 billion 4 billion
Transistor density 21.13 MTr/mm² 20 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory Frequency 2001 MHz 2001 MHz
Bus 128 bit 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 8000 MB/s 8000 MB/s
Memory Size 4 GB 4 GB
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
192 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
128.1 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 7.5
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below