Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Nvidia GeForce MX330

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650, vs Nvidia GeForce MX330. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and Nvidia GeForce MX330
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
54
31
23
14
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
41
35
22
11
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
74
54
35
13
26
16
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
44
42
28
14
17
15
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
24
20
14
n/a
13
9
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
37
31
18
12
23
22
14
10
Ghost of Tsushima
24
18
13
n/a
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
26
22
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
47
42
27
14
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High4113
1080p Ultra339
1440p Ultra21-
4K Ultra11-
DeviationLowHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
3419
Nvidia GeForce MX330
815
Time Spy35651060
Solar Bay12312n/a
Fire Strike96843203
Night Raid4601615136
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
39481
Nvidia GeForce MX330
11508
Background Blur66.4 frames/s29.1 frames/s
Face Detection43.3 frames/s14.1 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.51 Gpix/sec0.43 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.68 Gpix/sec0.62 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.87 Gpix/sec0.65 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.49 Gpix/sec0.12 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching187.9 Gpix/sec37.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5261.5 fps1049.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
7880
Nvidia GeForce MX330
2408
G2D Mark565228
DirectX 1158 fps19 fps
DirectX 1235 fps12 fps
GPU Compute3058 Ops/s991 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
47.5 fps
Nvidia GeForce MX330
15.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)251.1 fps82.1 fps
Car Chase240.5 fps82.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)200.6 fps70.9 fps
T-Rex931.9 fps301.3 fps
ALU 21021.5 fps314.6 fps
Driver Overhead 2270.6 fps206.7 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1151.2376.5

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced April, 23, 2019 February, 10, 2020
Form Factor PC use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Turing Pascal
Codename TU117 GP108
Price 149 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 1485 MHz 746-1531 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1665 MHz 936-1594 MHz
Shader Units 896 384
TMUs 56 24
ROPs 32 16
Execution Units 14 3
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 64 KB/core 48 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 512 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 53 Gpix/sec 15-26 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 93 GTex/s 22-38 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 0.7-1.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x4
TGP 75 W 10-30 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 12 nm 14 nm
Transistor Size 200 mm² 74 mm²
Transistor count 4 billion 1.8 billion
Transistor density 20 MTr/mm² 24.32 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory Frequency 2001 MHz 1752 MHz
Bus 128 bit 64 bit
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 8000 MB/s 7000 MB/s
Memory Size 4 GB 2 GB
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
128.1 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce MX330
56 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 6.1
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below