Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc A750

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650, vs Intel Arc A750. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel Arc A750
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
54
31
23
14
116
67
60
43
The Witcher 3
41
35
22
11
128
110
78
42
Counter-Strike 2
74
54
35
13
155
109
81
41
Far Cry 6
44
42
28
14
99
88
67
37
Hogwarts Legacy
24
20
14
n/a
63
52
37
21
COD Modern Warfare 3
37
31
18
12
69
70
48
30
Ghost of Tsushima
24
18
13
n/a
64
51
38
19
Cyberpunk 2077
26
22
13
n/a
80
68
46
18
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
47
42
27
14
112
98
70
39
Avg FPS
1080p High4198
1080p Ultra3379
1440p Ultra2158
4K Ultra1132
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
3419
Intel Arc A750
10871
Time Spy356512448
Solar Bay1231245304
Port Royaln/a6578
Fire Strike968430927
Night Raid46016110958
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
39481
Intel Arc A750
99280
Background Blur66.4 frames/s145.2 frames/s
Face Detection43.3 frames/s82 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.51 Gpix/sec3.35 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.68 Gpix/sec5.01 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.87 Gpix/sec7.59 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.49 Gpix/sec0.81 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching187.9 Gpix/sec462.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5261.5 fps18623.1 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
7880
Intel Arc A750
12348
G2D Mark565719
DirectX 1158 fps70 fps
DirectX 1235 fps70 fps
GPU Compute3058 Ops/s5393 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
47.5 fps
Intel Arc A750
137.9 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)251.1 fps732.4 fps
Car Chase240.5 fps471.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)200.6 fps465.4 fps
T-Rex931.9 fps2668.4 fps
ALU 21021.5 fps3065.6 fps
Driver Overhead 2270.6 fps170.6 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1151.23725.6

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia Intel
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced April, 23, 2019 October, 12, 2023
Form Factor PC use PC use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Turing Generation 12.7
Codename TU117 DG2-512
Price 149 289

GPU

GPU Frequency 1485 MHz 2050 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1665 MHz 2400 MHz
Shader Units 896 3584
TMUs 56 224
ROPs 32 112
Execution Units 14 n/a
Ray Tracing Cores No 28
Tensor Cores No 448
L1 cache 64 KB/core n/a
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 16000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 53 Gpix/sec 269 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 93 GTex/s 538 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 17.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 75 W 225 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 12 nm 6 nm
Transistor Size 200 mm² 406 mm²
Transistor count 4 billion 21 billion
Transistor density 20 MTr/mm² 51.72 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 2001 MHz 2000 MHz
Bus 128 bit 256 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 8000 MB/s 16000 MB/s
Memory Size 4 GB 8 GB
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
128.1 GB/s
Intel Arc A750
512 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4a 2.0
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Arc A750 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below