Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon 610M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650, vs AMD Radeon 610M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon 610M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
54
31
23
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
41
35
22
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
74
54
35
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Far Cry 6
44
42
28
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
24
20
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
37
31
18
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
24
18
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
26
22
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
47
42
27
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High41n/a
1080p Ultra33n/a
1440p Ultra21n/a
4K Ultra11n/a
DeviationLown/a

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
3419
AMD Radeon 610M
454
Time Spy3565522
Solar Bay123122152
Port Royaln/a308
Fire Strike96841805
Night Raid460167584
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
39481
AMD Radeon 610M
5099
Background Blur66.4 frames/s12 frames/s
Face Detection43.3 frames/s6.42 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.51 Gpix/sec0.16 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.68 Gpix/sec0.23 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.87 Gpix/sec0.16 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.49 Gpix/sec0.07 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching187.9 Gpix/sec18.2 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5261.5 fps828.6 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
7880
AMD Radeon 610M
1618
G2D Mark565526
DirectX 1158 fps16 fps
DirectX 1235 fps6 fps
GPU Compute3058 Ops/s702 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
47.5 fps
AMD Radeon 610M
n/a
Aztec Ruins (Normal)251.1 fpsn/a
Car Chase240.5 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)200.6 fpsn/a
T-Rex931.9 fpsn/a
ALU 21021.5 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2270.6 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLn/a
OSWindowsn/a
Tessellation1151.2n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced April, 23, 2019 October, 1, 2022
Form Factor PC use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Turing RDNA 2.0
Codename TU117 Mendocino
Price 149 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 1485 MHz 400 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1665 MHz 1900-2200 MHz
Shader Units 896 128
TMUs 56 8
ROPs 32 4
Execution Units 14 2
Ray Tracing Cores No 2
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache 64 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 53 Gpix/sec 8-9 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 93 GTex/s 15-18 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 0.5-0.6 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 75 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 12 nm 6 nm
Transistor Size 200 mm² 122 mm²
Transistor count 4 billion 3.4 billion
Transistor density 20 MTr/mm² 27.87 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR5 System Shared
Memory Frequency 2001 MHz n/a
Bus 128 bit n/a
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 8000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 4 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
128.1 GB/s
AMD Radeon 610M
n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4a n/a
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below