Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon 890M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650, vs AMD Radeon 890M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon 890M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
54
31
23
14
58
31
27
14
The Witcher 3
41
35
22
11
36
28
15
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
74
54
35
13
53
34
24
10
Far Cry 6
44
42
28
14
46
36
23
12
Hogwarts Legacy
24
20
14
n/a
25
19
15
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
37
31
18
12
40
34
22
15
Ghost of Tsushima
24
18
13
n/a
24
19
12
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
26
22
13
n/a
26
21
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
47
42
27
14
42
37
25
12
Avg FPS
1080p High4139
1080p Ultra3329
1440p Ultra2119
4K Ultra1110
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
3419
AMD Radeon 890M
3224
Time Spy35653373
Solar Bay1231214769
Port Royaln/a1820
Fire Strike96849007
Night Raid4601639135
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
39481
AMD Radeon 890M
42932
Background Blur66.4 frames/s98.6 frames/s
Face Detection43.3 frames/s42 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.51 Gpix/sec1.25 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.68 Gpix/sec1.6 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.87 Gpix/sec1.69 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.49 Gpix/sec0.55 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching187.9 Gpix/sec214.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5261.5 fps7757.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
7880
AMD Radeon 890M
8470
G2D Mark5651006
DirectX 1158 fps77 fps
DirectX 1235 fps37 fps
GPU Compute3058 Ops/s4421 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
47.5 fps
AMD Radeon 890M
39.7 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)251.1 fps197.2 fps
Car Chase240.5 fps229.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)200.6 fps189.7 fps
T-Rex931.9 fps754.1 fps
ALU 21021.5 fps906.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2270.6 fps251.3 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1151.21577.3

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced April, 23, 2019 June, 3, 2024
Form Factor PC use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Turing RDNA 3+
Codename TU117 Strix Point
Price 149 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 1485 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1665 MHz 2900 MHz
Shader Units 896 1024
TMUs 56 64
ROPs 32 40
Execution Units 14 16
Ray Tracing Cores No 16
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache 64 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 53 Gpix/sec 116 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 93 GTex/s 186 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 5.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 75 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 12 nm 4 nm
Max temperature n/a 100 °C
Transistor Size 200 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 4 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 20 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR5 System Shared
Memory Frequency 2001 MHz n/a
Bus 128 bit n/a
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 8000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 4 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
128.1 GB/s
AMD Radeon 890M
n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4a 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider AMD Radeon 890M the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below