Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Intel Arc A770
24
out 100
VS
47
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, vs Intel Arc A770. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 91 52 43 25 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 87 70 47 26 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 138 98 71 31 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 75 66 47 24 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 49 37 27 13 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 56 49 33 23 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 45 34 25 13 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 47 45 25 12 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 80 74 49 27 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 74 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 58 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 41 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 22 | n/a |
| Deviation | Low | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 6344 | 13558 |
| Solar Bay | 20462 | 50936 |
| Port Royal | 1652 | 7212 |
| Fire Strike | 16643 | 34434 |
| Night Raid | 76116 | 122639 |
| Background Blur | 124.8 frames/s | 175 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 69.4 frames/s | 98 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 2.67 Gpix/sec | 3.63 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 3.48 Gpix/sec | 5.51 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 3.52 Gpix/sec | 8.51 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.92 Gpix/sec | 0.89 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 355.9 Gpix/sec | 492.6 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 9094.4 fps | 24819.2 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 807 | 754 |
| DirectX 11 | 103 fps | 75 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 51 fps | 74 fps |
| GPU Compute | 5253 Ops/s | 5970 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 404.9 fps | 792.8 fps |
| Car Chase | 369.2 fps | 539 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 324.3 fps | 517.9 fps |
| T-Rex | 1580.9 fps | 2806.8 fps |
| ALU 2 | 1754.8 fps | 3955.4 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 257.4 fps | 181.4 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 1901.6 | 4205.3 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Intel |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | February, 22, 2019 | October, 12, 2022 |
| Form Factor | PC use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Entry-level | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.7 |
| Codename | TU116 | DG2-512 |
| Price | 279 | 329 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1500 MHz | 2100 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1770 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Shader Units | 1536 | 4096 |
| TMUs | 96 | 256 |
| ROPs | 48 | 128 |
| Execution Units | 24 | n/a |
| Ray Tracing Cores | No | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | No | 512 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 1536 KB/core | 16000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 85 Gpix/sec | 307 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 170 GTex/s | 614 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 5.4 TFLOPS | 19.7 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 120 W | 225 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor Size | 284 mm² | 406 mm² |
| Transistor count | 6 billion | 21 billion |
| Transistor density | 21.13 MTr/mm² | 51.72 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | 1500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Bus | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 12000 MB/s | 16000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Arc A770 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
