Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 vs Nvidia GeForce MX450

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 960, vs Nvidia GeForce MX450. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 and Nvidia GeForce MX450
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
28
16
14
n/a
18
10
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
21
20
13
n/a
14
12
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
47
27
18
n/a
37
19
13
n/a
Far Cry 6
31
26
19
11
24
21
12
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
16
12
11
n/a
17
11
9
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
28
24
16
12
30
20
13
10
Ghost of Tsushima
16
9
n/a
n/a
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
14
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
30
25
18
n/a
21
17
10
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High2620
1080p Ultra1913
1440p Ultra149
4K Ultra--
DeviationLowMedium

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
2183
Nvidia GeForce MX450
1033
Time Spy23032124
Fire Strike77205281
Night Raid3109326963
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
20370
Nvidia GeForce MX450
34221
Background Blur51.7 frames/s65.7 frames/s
Face Detection26.1 frames/s33.3 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.84 Gpix/sec1.01 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.36 Gpix/sec1.39 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.26 Gpix/sec1.61 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.14 Gpix/sec0.48 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching64.9 Gpix/sec176 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics1825 fps5012.4 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
6108
Nvidia GeForce MX450
3752
G2D Mark674307
DirectX 1142 fps26 fps
DirectX 1228 fps24 fps
GPU Compute2797 Ops/s1878 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
31.1 fps
Nvidia GeForce MX450
25.9 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)185.1 fps145.1 fps
Car Chase177 fps144.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)151.2 fps124.1 fps
T-Rex677.4 fps582.5 fps
ALU 2745.3 fps799.9 fps
Driver Overhead 2274.9 fps214.8 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation982.4936.1

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced January, 22, 2015 August, 25, 2020
Form Factor PC use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Maxwell 2.0 Turing
Codename GM206 TU117
Price 199 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 1127 MHz 720-1395 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1178 MHz 930-1575 MHz
Shader Units 1024 896
TMUs 64 56
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 8 14
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 48 KB/core 64 KB/core
L2 cache 1000 KB/core 512 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 38 Gpix/sec 30-50 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 75 GTex/s 52-88 GTex/s
FLOPS 2.4 TFLOPS 1.7-2.8 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x4
TGP 120 W 10-30 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 28 nm 12 nm
Transistor Size 228 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor count 2 billion 4.7 billion
Transistor density 8.77 MTr/mm² 23.5 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 1753 MHz 1250 MHz
Bus 128 bit 64 bit
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 7000 MB/s 10000 MB/s
Memory Size 2 GB 2 GB
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
112.2 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce MX450
80 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 5.2 7.5
DisplayPort 1.2 1.4
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce MX450 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below