Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 vs AMD Radeon 660M
11
out 100
VS
24
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 960, vs AMD Radeon 660M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 28 16 14 n/a | 27 13 11 n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 21 20 13 n/a | 10 12 n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 47 27 18 n/a | 24 18 12 n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 31 26 19 11 | 22 18 10 n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 16 12 11 n/a | 12 n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 28 24 16 12 | 20 16 13 n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 16 9 n/a n/a | 12 9 n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 14 11 n/a n/a | 9 10 n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30 25 18 n/a | 15 14 11 n/a |
| 1080p High | 26 | 17 |
| 1080p Ultra | 19 | 13 |
| 1440p Ultra | 14 | 9 |
| 4K Ultra | - | - |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 2303 | 1532 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 6227 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 613 |
| Fire Strike | 7720 | 4906 |
| Night Raid | 31093 | 20196 |
| Background Blur | 51.7 frames/s | 36 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 26.1 frames/s | 16.4 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 0.84 Gpix/sec | 0.48 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.36 Gpix/sec | 0.65 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.26 Gpix/sec | 0.53 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.14 Gpix/sec | 0.18 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 64.9 Gpix/sec | 46.5 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 1825 fps | 2056.5 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 674 | 701 |
| DirectX 11 | 42 fps | 92 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 28 fps | 45 fps |
| GPU Compute | 2797 Ops/s | 1972 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 185.1 fps | 109.1 fps |
| Car Chase | 177 fps | 106.4 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 151.2 fps | 87.7 fps |
| T-Rex | 677.4 fps | 368.5 fps |
| ALU 2 | 745.3 fps | 451.3 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 274.9 fps | 170.1 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 982.4 | 320.9 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | AMD |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | January, 22, 2015 | January, 1, 2022 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Universal |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Codename | GM206 | Rembrandt |
| Price | 199 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1127 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1178 MHz | 1800-1900 MHz |
| Shader Units | 1024 | 384 |
| TMUs | 64 | 24 |
| ROPs | 32 | 16 |
| Execution Units | 8 | 6 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | No | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | No | n/a |
| L1 cache | 48 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 1000 KB/core | 1024 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 38 Gpix/sec | 29-30 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 75 GTex/s | 43-46 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 2.4 TFLOPS | 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 120 W | 15 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor Size | 228 mm² | 208 mm² |
| Transistor count | 2 billion | 13.1 billion |
| Transistor density | 8.77 MTr/mm² | 62.98 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 1753 MHz | n/a |
| Bus | 128 bit | n/a |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 7000 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 2 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.2 | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider AMD Radeon 660M the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
