Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon 680M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, vs AMD Radeon 680M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and AMD Radeon 680M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
67
38
28
14
42
23
17
10
The Witcher 3
49
41
28
14
19
21
10
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
89
60
39
16
39
23
20
n/a
Far Cry 6
51
46
31
15
33
27
19
9
Hogwarts Legacy
30
21
16
9
18
12
9
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
37
30
21
14
27
24
19
10
Ghost of Tsushima
28
20
14
n/a
19
11
9
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
30
26
17
n/a
19
15
10
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
55
49
32
18
25
24
17
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High4827
1080p Ultra3720
1440p Ultra2514
4K Ultra13-
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3956
AMD Radeon 680M
2194
Time Spy39082337
Solar Bay1900310075
Port Royal4131022
Fire Strike101966948
Night Raid4516727970
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
42967
AMD Radeon 680M
28675
Background Blur73.3 frames/s73.8 frames/s
Face Detection39.7 frames/s30.1 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.65 Gpix/sec0.93 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection2.13 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.06 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.55 Gpix/sec0.37 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching191.1 Gpix/sec105 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5921.5 fps4640 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
7774
AMD Radeon 680M
4668
G2D Mark481751
DirectX 1148 fps45 fps
DirectX 1242 fps22 fps
GPU Compute3639 Ops/s2163 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
51 fps
AMD Radeon 680M
27.3 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)262.9 fps142 fps
Car Chase255.7 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)207.6 fpsn/a
T-Rex950.2 fpsn/a
ALU 21377.4 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2232.9 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLVulkan
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1502.2n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced December, 17, 2021 January, 1, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Ampere RDNA 2.0
Codename GA107 Rembrandt

GPU

GPU Frequency 735-1185 MHz 400 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1245-1477 MHz 2200-2400 MHz
Shader Units 2048 768
TMUs 64 48
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 16 12
Ray Tracing Cores 32 12
Tensor Cores 64 n/a
L1 cache 64 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 2000 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 40-47 Gpix/sec 70-77 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 80-95 GTex/s 106-115 GTex/s
FLOPS 5.1-6 TFLOPS 3.4-3.7 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 30-45 W 15 W
Process Samsung TSMC
Process tech. 8 nm 6 nm
Transistor Size 200 mm² 208 mm²
Transistor count 8 billion 13.1 billion
Transistor density 40 MTr/mm² 62.98 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Frequency 1750 MHz n/a
Bus 64 bit n/a
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 14000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 4 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
112 GB/s
AMD Radeon 680M
n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 8.6 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4a n/a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below