Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070
38
out 100
VS
55
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 108 65 55 38 | 170 113 105 79 |
 The Witcher 3 | 122 97 72 39 | 191 160 114 61 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 177 131 93 44 | 262 207 148 82 |
 Far Cry 6 | 90 81 62 34 | 148 135 112 71 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 66 54 38 20 | 120 96 78 43 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 78 70 51 32 | 154 141 110 72 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 61 46 36 21 | 104 87 74 40 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 66 61 34 17 | 133 115 78 34 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 105 96 65 37 | 209 194 148 81 |
| 1080p High | 97 | 166 |
| 1080p Ultra | 78 | 139 |
| 1440p Ultra | 56 | 107 |
| 4K Ultra | 31 | 63 |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 8738 | 17825 |
| Solar Bay | 38651 | 82645 |
| Port Royal | 5061 | 11149 |
| Fire Strike | 22534 | 44109 |
| Night Raid | 92073 | 152587 |
| Background Blur | 155.7 frames/s | 233 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 93.7 frames/s | 141.7 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 3.81 Gpix/sec | 6.62 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 4.91 Gpix/sec | 9.19 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 4.89 Gpix/sec | 9.2 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.09 Gpix/sec | 1.78 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 381.7 Gpix/sec | 845.4 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 10550.4 fps | 25043.9 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 856 | 1165 |
| DirectX 11 | 130 fps | 245 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 61 fps | 102 fps |
| GPU Compute | 6758 Ops/s | 14820 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 504.3 fps | 1039 fps |
| Car Chase | 452.3 fps | 900 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 394.6 fps | 761.2 fps |
| T-Rex | 1932.3 fps | 3848.1 fps |
| ALU 2 | 2370.8 fps | 5980.8 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 279.9 fps | 296.7 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 2410.6 | 6200.7 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | July, 9, 2019 | April, 13, 2023 |
| Form Factor | PC use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | TU106 | AD104 |
| Price | 399 | 599 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1470 MHz | 1920 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1650 MHz | 2475 MHz |
| Shader Units | 2176 | 5888 |
| TMUs | 136 | 184 |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| Execution Units | 34 | 46 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 272 | 184 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 4000 KB/core | 36000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 106 Gpix/sec | 158 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 224 GTex/s | 455 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 7.2 TFLOPS | 29.1 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 175 W | 200 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | 445 mm² | 294 mm² |
| Transistor count | 10 billion | 35 billion |
| Transistor density | 22.47 MTr/mm² | 119.05 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | 1313 MHz |
| Bus | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 14000 MB/s | 21000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 2 | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
