Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
33
out 100
VS
20
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 99 62 49 35 | 34 18 15 9 |
 The Witcher 3 | 107 86 62 34 | 23 21 14 n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 157 117 82 41 | 46 27 21 9 |
 Far Cry 6 | 84 74 57 29 | 31 29 19 10 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 59 47 33 15 | 20 13 11 n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 69 59 44 30 | 28 26 15 11 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 53 42 30 18 | 17 9 10 n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 58 52 32 13 | 17 12 n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 92 85 58 33 | 28 26 18 n/a |
| 1080p High | 86 | 27 |
| 1080p Ultra | 69 | 20 |
| 1440p Ultra | 50 | 14 |
| 4K Ultra | 28 | - |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 7571 | 2345 |
| Solar Bay | 34179 | n/a |
| Port Royal | 4134 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 19768 | 7709 |
| Night Raid | 84918 | 31352 |
| Background Blur | 144.4 frames/s | 57 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 75.2 frames/s | 27.8 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 3.08 Gpix/sec | 0.84 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 4.25 Gpix/sec | 1.22 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 4.21 Gpix/sec | 1.32 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.93 Gpix/sec | 0.19 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 354.4 Gpix/sec | 73.2 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 8559.4 fps | 2037 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 747 | 323 |
| DirectX 11 | 110 fps | 45 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 53 fps | 24 fps |
| GPU Compute | 5513 Ops/s | 2190 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 477.6 fps | 166.7 fps |
| Car Chase | 423 fps | 150.1 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 370.8 fps | 134.4 fps |
| T-Rex | 1884.9 fps | 643.6 fps |
| ALU 2 | 2192.3 fps | 622.1 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 281.3 fps | 202.8 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 2405.1 | 730.8 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | January, 15, 2019 | January, 3, 2017 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Codename | TU106 | GP107 (N17P-G1) |
| Price | 349 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1365 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1680 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Shader Units | 1920 | 768 |
| TMUs | 120 | 48 |
| ROPs | 48 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 30 | 6 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | No |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | No |
| L1 cache | 64 KB/core | 48 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 1024 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 81 Gpix/sec | 52 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 202 GTex/s | 78 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 6.5 TFLOPS | 2.5 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TGP | 160 W | 65 W |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistor Size | 445 mm² | 132 mm² |
| Transistor count | 10 billion | 3.3 billion |
| Transistor density | 22.47 MTr/mm² | 25 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Bus | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 14000 MB/s | 7008 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 6.1 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | No |
| DLSS | DLSS 2 | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
