Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs Apple A18 Pro GPU
51
out 100
VS
28
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, vs Apple A18 Pro GPU. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 152 98 87 65 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 172 140 103 55 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 253 199 137 80 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 133 122 98 59 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 101 83 64 34 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 126 117 88 56 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 93 75 61 34 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 109 95 63 27 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 174 156 116 63 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 146 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 121 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 91 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 53 | n/a |
| Deviation | Low | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 14660 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | 64266 | 7273 |
| Port Royal | 9109 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 35668 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 114857 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 211 frames/s | n/a |
| Face Detection | 141.3 frames/s | n/a |
| Horizon Detection | 6.24 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Edge Detection | 8.1 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Gaussian Blur | 9.22 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Feature Matching | 1.46 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Stereo Matching | 627.3 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Particle Physics | 16980.5 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenCL | n/a |
| G2D Mark | 928 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 190 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 84 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 10244 Ops/s | n/a |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 776.4 fps | n/a |
| Car Chase | 675.9 fps | n/a |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 655.7 fps | n/a |
| T-Rex | 3193.1 fps | n/a |
| ALU 2 | 4775.9 fps | n/a |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 278.9 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenGL | n/a |
| OS | Windows | n/a |
| Tessellation | 4776.1 | n/a |
| Image Classification (SP) | n/a | 3264 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | n/a | 4550 |
| Horizon Detection | n/a | 6705 |
| Face Detection (HP) | n/a | 11770 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | n/a | 15548 |
| Text Classification (SP) | n/a | 3678 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | n/a | 5678 |
| Object Detection (SP) | n/a | 3360 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | n/a | 13468 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | n/a | 31541 |
| Framework | n/a | Core ML |
| Backend | n/a | GPU |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Apple |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | September, 27, 2018 | September, 9, 2024 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Universal |
| Segment | High-end | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Turing | Apple M GPU |
| Codename | TU102 | Custom |
| Price | 999 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1350 MHz | n/a |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1545 MHz | 1490 MHz |
| Shader Units | 4352 | 768 |
| TMUs | 272 | 40 |
| ROPs | 88 | n/a |
| Execution Units | 68 | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68 | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | 544 | n/a |
| L1 cache | 64 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 5632 KB/core | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 136 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Texture Fill Rate | 420 GTex/s | 60 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 13.4 TFLOPS | 2.3 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Custom |
| TGP | 250 W | n/a |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Transistor Size | 754 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 18 billion | n/a |
| Transistor density | 23.87 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | 7500 MHz |
| Bus | 352 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 14000 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 11 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | n/a |
| CUDA | 7.5 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 2 | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
