Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon 890M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, vs AMD Radeon 890M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon 890M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
132
85
77
55
58
31
27
14
The Witcher 3
152
123
91
47
36
28
15
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
226
170
122
67
53
34
24
10
Far Cry 6
114
104
81
47
46
36
23
12
Hogwarts Legacy
86
70
55
26
25
19
15
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
109
99
69
45
40
34
22
15
Ghost of Tsushima
82
66
48
30
24
19
12
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
92
83
51
23
26
21
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
139
129
97
52
42
37
25
12
Avg FPS
1080p High12639
1080p Ultra10329
1440p Ultra7719
4K Ultra4410
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
11980
AMD Radeon 890M
3224
Time Spy117083373
Solar Bay5434414769
Port Royal69691820
Fire Strike295619007
Night Raid10936639135
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
115518
AMD Radeon 890M
42932
Background Blur185.1 frames/s98.6 frames/s
Face Detection108.4 frames/s42 frames/s
Horizon Detection5.35 Gpix/sec1.25 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection7.17 Gpix/sec1.6 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur5.54 Gpix/sec1.69 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching1.15 Gpix/sec0.55 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching478 Gpix/sec214.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics15183 fps7757.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
20395
AMD Radeon 890M
8470
G2D Mark9881006
DirectX 11163 fps77 fps
DirectX 1279 fps37 fps
GPU Compute10075 Ops/s4421 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
143 fps
AMD Radeon 890M
39.7 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)733.4 fps197.2 fps
Car Chase614.3 fps229.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)523.6 fps189.7 fps
T-Rex2676.1 fps754.1 fps
ALU 23657.2 fps906.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2282.8 fps251.3 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation36701577.3

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced December, 2, 2020 June, 3, 2024
Form Factor PC use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Ampere RDNA 3+
Codename GA104 Strix Point
Price 399 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 1410 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1665 MHz 2900 MHz
Shader Units 4864 1024
TMUs 152 64
ROPs 80 40
Execution Units 38 16
Ray Tracing Cores 38 16
Tensor Cores 152 n/a
L1 cache 128 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 4000 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 133 Gpix/sec 116 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 253 GTex/s 186 GTex/s
FLOPS 16.2 TFLOPS 5.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 200 W 15 W
Process Samsung TSMC
Process tech. 8 nm 4 nm
Max temperature n/a 100 °C
Transistor Size 392 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 17 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 43.37 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Frequency 1750 MHz n/a
Bus 256 bit n/a
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 14000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 8 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
448 GB/s
AMD Radeon 890M
n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 8.6 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4a 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 2 No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
12 (57.14%)
9 (42.86%)
Total Votes: 21

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below