Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
44
out 100
VS
72
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 146 94 84 60 | 207 146 140 104 |
 The Witcher 3 | 172 142 100 54 | 225 190 142 72 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 239 194 133 77 | 292 216 165 85 |
 Far Cry 6 | 129 118 95 56 | 164 149 136 85 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 95 81 62 31 | 143 120 96 55 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 122 110 82 53 | 191 187 144 100 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 88 73 55 33 | 130 110 96 58 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 104 93 56 29 | 175 151 107 48 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 157 149 110 60 | 263 247 196 104 |
| 1080p High | 139 | 199 |
| 1080p Ultra | 117 | 168 |
| 1440p Ultra | 86 | 136 |
| 4K Ultra | 50 | 79 |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 13469 | 24225 |
| Solar Bay | 62160 | 116030 |
| Port Royal | 8112 | 15768 |
| Fire Strike | 34295 | 56271 |
| Night Raid | 137720 | 174807 |
| Background Blur | 232.6 frames/s | 331.7 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 138.4 frames/s | 211.6 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 4.68 Gpix/sec | 9.63 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 6.06 Gpix/sec | 13.7 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 6.99 Gpix/sec | 13.9 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.6 Gpix/sec | 2.15 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 652.6 Gpix/sec | 1210 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 19534.7 fps | 33566 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1067 | 1218 |
| DirectX 11 | 201 fps | 280 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 90 fps | 117 fps |
| GPU Compute | 12216 Ops/s | 18522 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 725.1 fps | 1300.6 fps |
| Car Chase | 609.6 fps | 1119.6 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 484.8 fps | 943.4 fps |
| T-Rex | 2723.3 fps | 4724.8 fps |
| ALU 2 | 3299.3 fps | 8528.7 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 272.9 fps | 289.1 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 3381.9 | 8597.7 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | July, 18, 2023 | January, 24, 2024 |
| Form Factor | PC use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | High-end |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | AD106 | AD103 |
| Price | 499 | 799 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2310 MHz | 2340 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2535 MHz | 2610 MHz |
| Shader Units | 4352 | 8448 |
| TMUs | 136 | 264 |
| ROPs | 48 | 96 |
| Execution Units | 34 | 66 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 66 |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 264 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 32000 KB/core | 48000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 122 Gpix/sec | 251 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 345 GTex/s | 689 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 22.1 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 165 W | 285 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | 188 mm² | 379 mm² |
| Transistor count | 22 billion | 45 billion |
| Transistor density | 117.02 MTr/mm² | 118.73 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Frequency | 2250 MHz | 1313 MHz |
| Bus | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 18000 MB/s | 21000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 3 | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
