Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
44
out 100
VS
92
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 146 94 84 60 | 277 199 191 154 |
 The Witcher 3 | 172 142 100 54 | 288 265 187 100 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 239 194 133 77 | 329 244 185 91 |
 Far Cry 6 | 129 118 95 56 | 203 182 167 104 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 95 81 62 31 | 201 164 132 76 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 122 110 82 53 | 274 258 221 149 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 88 73 55 33 | 183 154 137 91 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 104 93 56 29 | 227 208 143 68 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 157 149 110 60 | 304 277 215 119 |
| 1080p High | 139 | 254 |
| 1080p Ultra | 117 | 217 |
| 1440p Ultra | 86 | 175 |
| 4K Ultra | 50 | 106 |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 13469 | 36322 |
| Solar Bay | 62160 | 186930 |
| Port Royal | 8112 | 26115 |
| Fire Strike | 34295 | 72253 |
| Night Raid | 137720 | 195300 |
| Background Blur | 232.6 frames/s | 318.9 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 138.4 frames/s | 222.8 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 4.68 Gpix/sec | 14.2 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 6.06 Gpix/sec | 21 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 6.99 Gpix/sec | 23.9 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.6 Gpix/sec | 2.38 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 652.6 Gpix/sec | 1950 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 19534.7 fps | 48090.4 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1067 | 1297 |
| DirectX 11 | 201 fps | 329 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 90 fps | 150 fps |
| GPU Compute | 12216 Ops/s | 27111 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 725.1 fps | 1617.6 fps |
| Car Chase | 609.6 fps | 1228.6 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 484.8 fps | 1234.6 fps |
| T-Rex | 2723.3 fps | 6286 fps |
| ALU 2 | 3299.3 fps | 15073.4 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 272.9 fps | 303.7 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 3381.9 | 12119.1 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | July, 18, 2023 | September, 20, 2022 |
| Form Factor | PC use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | High-end |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | AD106 | AD102 |
| Price | 499 | 1599 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2310 MHz | 2235 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2535 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Shader Units | 4352 | 16384 |
| TMUs | 136 | 512 |
| ROPs | 48 | 176 |
| Execution Units | 34 | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 512 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 32000 KB/core | 72 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 122 Gpix/sec | 444 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 345 GTex/s | 1290 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 22.1 TFLOPS | 82.6 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 165 W | 450 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | 188 mm² | 609 mm² |
| Transistor count | 22 billion | 76.3 billion |
| Transistor density | 117.02 MTr/mm² | 125.29 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Frequency | 2250 MHz | 2625 MHz |
| Bus | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 18000 MB/s | 21000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 3 | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 4
