Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
44
out 100
VS
22
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 146 94 84 60 | 21 10 n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 172 142 100 54 | 13 10 n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 239 194 133 77 | 20 11 9 n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 129 118 95 56 | 14 11 n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 95 81 62 31 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 122 110 82 53 | 13 11 10 n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 88 73 55 33 | 10 n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 104 93 56 29 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 157 149 110 60 | 13 11 9 n/a |
| 1080p High | 139 | 13 |
| 1080p Ultra | 117 | 9 |
| 1440p Ultra | 86 | - |
| 4K Ultra | 50 | - |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 13469 | 1291 |
| Solar Bay | 62160 | n/a |
| Port Royal | 8112 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 34295 | 4470 |
| Night Raid | 137720 | 14228 |
| Background Blur | 232.6 frames/s | 34.5 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 138.4 frames/s | 27.4 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 4.68 Gpix/sec | 0.75 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 6.06 Gpix/sec | 1.11 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 6.99 Gpix/sec | 0.39 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.6 Gpix/sec | 0.18 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 652.6 Gpix/sec | 55.6 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 19534.7 fps | 3061.7 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1067 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 201 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 90 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 12216 Ops/s | n/a |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 725.1 fps | n/a |
| Car Chase | 609.6 fps | n/a |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 484.8 fps | n/a |
| T-Rex | 2723.3 fps | n/a |
| ALU 2 | 3299.3 fps | n/a |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 272.9 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenGL | n/a |
| OS | Windows | n/a |
| Tessellation | 3381.9 | n/a |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Intel |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | July, 18, 2023 | August, 15, 2020 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Universal |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.1 |
| Codename | AD106 | Tiger Lake GT2 |
| Price | 499 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2310 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2535 MHz | 950-1550 MHz |
| Shader Units | 4352 | 768 |
| TMUs | 136 | 48 |
| ROPs | 48 | 24 |
| Execution Units | 34 | 96 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | No |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | No |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 32000 KB/core | 1024 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 122 Gpix/sec | 23-37 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 345 GTex/s | 46-74 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 22.1 TFLOPS | 1.5-2.4 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Ring Bus |
| TGP | 165 W | 15 W |
| Process | TSMC | Intel |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Transistor Size | 188 mm² | 146 mm² |
| Transistor count | 22 billion | n/a |
| Transistor density | 117.02 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 2250 MHz | n/a |
| Bus | 128 bit | n/a |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 18000 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | No |
| DLSS | DLSS 3 | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
