Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop vs Intel Arc A770
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, vs Intel Arc A770. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Time Spy | 12854 | 13558 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 50936 |
| Port Royal | 8539 | 7212 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 34434 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 122639 |
| Background Blur | 213.4 frames/s | 175 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 130.4 frames/s | 98 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 4.89 Gpix/sec | 3.63 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 6.23 Gpix/sec | 5.51 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 7.41 Gpix/sec | 8.51 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.46 Gpix/sec | 0.89 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 661.9 Gpix/sec | 492.6 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 19395.6 fps | 24819.2 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 991 | 754 |
| DirectX 11 | 173 fps | 75 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 98 fps | 74 fps |
| GPU Compute | 7598 Ops/s | 5970 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | n/a | 792.8 fps |
| Car Chase | n/a | 539 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | n/a | 517.9 fps |
| T-Rex | n/a | 2806.8 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 3955.4 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 181.4 fps |
| API | n/a | OpenGL |
| OS | n/a | Windows |
| Tessellation | n/a | 4205.3 |
Blender
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Intel |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | January, 7, 2025 | October, 12, 2022 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Codename | GB206-300 | DG2-512 |
| Price | n/a | 329 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 890-1410 MHz | 2100 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1410-2520 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Shader Units | 4608 | 4096 |
| TMUs | 144 | 256 |
| ROPs | 48 | 128 |
| Execution Units | 36 | n/a |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | 512 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 32000 KB/core | 16000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 68-121 Gpix/sec | 307 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 203-363 GTex/s | 614 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 13-23.2 TFLOPS | 19.7 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 50-125 W | 225 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor Size | 181 mm² | 406 mm² |
| Transistor count | 21.9 billion | 21 billion |
| Transistor density | 120.99 MTr/mm² | 51.72 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Bus | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 28000 MB/s | 16000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 12.0 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 2.1b | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 4 | No |
Results
No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.
Survey
Total Votes: 9