Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop vs Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core)
60
out 100
VS
43
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, vs Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 189 134 125 96 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 206 183 130 71 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 288 210 158 83 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 158 146 128 79 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 134 109 86 50 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 176 167 128 85 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 121 101 85 51 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 153 137 95 45 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 252 236 180 98 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 186 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 158 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 124 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 73 | n/a |
| Deviation | Medium | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 21794 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | 92888 | 46898 |
| Port Royal | 14027 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 46885 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 175963 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 194.4 frames/s | 177.6 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 165.6 frames/s | 114.5 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 8.61 Gpix/sec | 3.19 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 12.2 Gpix/sec | 4.45 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 11.5 Gpix/sec | 4.59 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.7 Gpix/sec | 0.96 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 1060 Gpix/sec | 250.4 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 27590.4 fps | 12529.9 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1139 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 254 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 116 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 12703 Ops/s | n/a |
| Image Classification (SP) | 10192 | 8870 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 23343 | 28795 |
| Horizon Detection | 31132 | 34820 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 46322 | 55699 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 134037 | 212347 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 3319 | 3018 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 4696 | 9102 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 13038 | 8163 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 52089 | 70908 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 248270 | 152297 |
| Framework | ONNX | Core ML |
| Backend | DirectML | GPU |
Blender
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Apple |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | January, 7, 2025 | March, 3, 2026 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Professional |
| Segment | High-end | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Apple M GPU |
| Codename | GB203-400 | Custom |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 975 MHz | n/a |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1500-2410 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Shader Units | 7680 | 2560 |
| TMUs | 240 | 160 |
| ROPs | 96 | 80 |
| Execution Units | 60 | 320 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | n/a |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 64 KB/core | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 144-231 Gpix/sec | 130 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 360-578 GTex/s | 259 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 23-37 TFLOPS | 8.3 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | Custom |
| TGP | 80-175 W | 28 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Max temperature | n/a | 100 °C |
| Transistor Size | 378 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 45.6 billion | 28 billion |
| Transistor density | 120.63 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR7 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | 9600 MHz |
| Bus | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 28000 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | n/a |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | n/a |
| CUDA | 10.1 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 2.1b | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 4 | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
