Intel Arc 130T vs AMD Radeon 680M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 130T, vs AMD Radeon 680M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 130T and AMD Radeon 680M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
49
28
17
9
42
23
17
10
The Witcher 3
39
31
24
11
19
21
10
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
43
26
18
10
39
23
20
n/a
Far Cry 6
34
29
19
9
33
27
19
9
Hogwarts Legacy
17
13
10
n/a
18
12
9
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
26
28
20
12
27
24
19
10
Ghost of Tsushima
19
15
10
n/a
19
11
9
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
22
15
10
n/a
19
15
10
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
34
31
18
12
25
24
17
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High3127
1080p Ultra2420
1440p Ultra1614
4K Ultra9-
DeviationHighLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 130T
2419
AMD Radeon 680M
2194
Time Spy37422337
Solar Bay1469610075
Port Royal19021022
Fire Strike91066948
Night Raid4101727970
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 130T
36282
AMD Radeon 680M
28675
Background Blur70.9 frames/s73.8 frames/s
Face Detection34.9 frames/s30.1 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.13 Gpix/sec0.93 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.42 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.96 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.45 Gpix/sec0.37 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching131.5 Gpix/sec105 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics7360.9 fps4640 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 130T
6127
AMD Radeon 680M
4668
G2D Mark881751
DirectX 1142 fps45 fps
DirectX 1223 fps22 fps
GPU Compute3275 Ops/s2163 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 130T
38.8 fps
AMD Radeon 680M
27.3 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a142 fps
APIOpenGLVulkan
OSWindowsWindows

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 6, 2025 January, 1, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Xe+ RDNA 2.0
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU Rembrandt

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 400 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2200 MHz 2200-2400 MHz
Shader Units 896 768
TMUs 56 48
ROPs 28 32
Execution Units 7 12
Ray Tracing Cores 7 12
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 62 Gpix/sec 70-77 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 123 GTex/s 106-115 GTex/s
FLOPS 3.9 TFLOPS 3.4-3.7 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP n/a 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 6 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 208 mm²
Transistor count n/a 13.1 billion
Transistor density n/a 62.98 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support n/a No

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No n/a
DisplayPort 2.1 n/a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below