Intel Arc 130V vs AMD Radeon 660M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 130V, vs AMD Radeon 660M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 130V and AMD Radeon 660M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
27
13
11
n/a
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
10
12
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
24
18
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
22
18
10
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
16
13
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
12
9
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9
10
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
15
14
11
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a17
1080p Ultran/a13
1440p Ultran/a9
4K Ultran/a-
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 130V
n/a
AMD Radeon 660M
1350
Time Spyn/a1532
Solar Bayn/a6227
Port Royaln/a613
Fire Striken/a4906
Night Raidn/a20196
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 130V
25557
AMD Radeon 660M
14065
Background Blur64.5 frames/s36 frames/s
Face Detection34.5 frames/s16.4 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.74 Gpix/sec0.48 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.02 Gpix/sec0.65 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.27 Gpix/sec0.53 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.34 Gpix/sec0.18 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching83.6 Gpix/sec46.5 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics3402.8 fps2056.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 130V
4577
AMD Radeon 660M
4461
G2D Mark601701
DirectX 1134 fps92 fps
DirectX 1223 fps45 fps
GPU Compute3118 Ops/s1972 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 130V
24.6 fps
AMD Radeon 660M
18.1 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)141.7 fps109.1 fps
Car Chasen/a106.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a87.7 fps
T-Rexn/a368.5 fps
ALU 2n/a451.3 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a170.1 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellationn/a320.9

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced September, 4, 2024 January, 1, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Xe2 RDNA 2.0
Codename Lunar Lake iGPU Rembrandt

GPU

GPU Frequency 600 MHz 400 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1850 MHz 1800-1900 MHz
Shader Units 896 384
TMUs n/a 24
ROPs n/a 16
Execution Units n/a 6
Ray Tracing Cores 7 6
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate n/a 29-30 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate n/a 43-46 GTex/s
FLOPS 3.3 TFLOPS 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 30 W 15 W
Process Intel TSMC
Process tech. 3 nm 6 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 208 mm²
Transistor count n/a 13.1 billion
Transistor density n/a 62.98 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No No

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No n/a
DisplayPort 2.1 n/a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below