Intel Arc 140T vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
89
50
41
26
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
85
64
45
23
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
132
94
65
32
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
72
61
50
23
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
46
35
25
14
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
55
46
33
23
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
44
32
24
12
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
43
43
25
9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
79
71
46
25
Avg FPS
1080p High3772
1080p Ultra2955
1440p Ultra1939
4K Ultra1021
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
6010
Time Spy40035856
Solar Bay14033n/a
Port Royal21113250
Fire Strike916619506
Night Raid3957570001
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
49950
Background Blur90 frames/s134.8 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s59.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec2.37 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec3.79 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec3.46 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.22 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec191.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps4183.6 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
13765
G2D Mark871853
DirectX 1150 fps106 fps
DirectX 1229 fps55 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s6126 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
73.4 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps391.3 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps375.2 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps337.9 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps1867.7 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps1803.6 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps264 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.92238.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 6, 2025 June, 2, 2015
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level High-end
Architecture Xe+ Maxwell 2.0
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU GM200
Price n/a 649

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 1000 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 1076 MHz
Shader Units 1024 2816
TMUs 64 176
ROPs 32 96
Execution Units 8 22
Ray Tracing Cores 8 No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache n/a 48 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 3000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 103 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 189 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 6.1 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP n/a 250 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 28 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 601 mm²
Transistor count n/a 8 billion
Transistor density n/a 13.31 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR5
Memory Frequency n/a 1753 MHz
Bus n/a 384 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 7000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 6 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 140T
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
336.6 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No 5.2
DisplayPort 2.1 1.2
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below