Intel Arc A770 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
47
out 100
VS
25
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc A770, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 56 31 27 14 |
 The Witcher 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 43 37 24 11 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 77 53 37 14 |
 Far Cry 6 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 45 40 26 15 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 24 18 16 9 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 38 28 21 13 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 26 15 15 n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 25 24 14 n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 50 46 26 14 |
| 1080p High | n/a | 43 |
| 1080p Ultra | n/a | 32 |
| 1440p Ultra | n/a | 23 |
| 4K Ultra | n/a | 11 |
| Deviation | n/a | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 13558 | 3675 |
| Solar Bay | 50936 | n/a |
| Port Royal | 7212 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 34434 | 10078 |
| Night Raid | 122639 | 42270 |
| Background Blur | 175 frames/s | 83.5 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 98 frames/s | 45.7 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 3.63 Gpix/sec | 1.77 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.51 Gpix/sec | 2.32 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 8.51 Gpix/sec | 2.28 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.89 Gpix/sec | 0.62 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 492.6 Gpix/sec | 204.1 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 24819.2 fps | 5954.3 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 754 | 381 |
| DirectX 11 | 75 fps | 61 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 74 fps | 33 fps |
| GPU Compute | 5970 Ops/s | 2733 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 792.8 fps | n/a |
| Car Chase | 539 fps | n/a |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 517.9 fps | n/a |
| T-Rex | 2806.8 fps | n/a |
| ALU 2 | 3955.4 fps | n/a |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 181.4 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenGL | n/a |
| OS | Windows | n/a |
| Tessellation | 4205.3 | n/a |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | October, 12, 2022 | April, 2, 2020 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Codename | DG2-512 | TU117 (N18P-G62) |
| Price | 329 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2100 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2400 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Shader Units | 4096 | 1024 |
| TMUs | 256 | 64 |
| ROPs | 128 | 32 |
| Execution Units | n/a | 16 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | No |
| Tensor Cores | 512 | No |
| L1 cache | n/a | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 16000 KB/core | 1000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 307 Gpix/sec | 48 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 614 GTex/s | 95 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 19.7 TFLOPS | 3 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TGP | 225 W | 50 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistor Size | 406 mm² | 200 mm² |
| Transistor count | 21 billion | 4.7 billion |
| Transistor density | 51.72 MTr/mm² | 23.5 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Bus | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 16000 MB/s | 12000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | n/a | 7.5 |
| DisplayPort | n/a | 1.4 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | No |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Arc A770 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
