AMD Radeon 610M vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 610M, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 610M and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
106
65
53
35
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
115
92
65
34
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
167
123
90
42
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
86
80
61
33
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
63
53
35
18
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
75
65
45
32
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
60
47
33
20
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
64
56
34
15
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
98
89
62
33
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a93
1080p Ultran/a74
1440p Ultran/a53
4K Ultran/a29
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 610M
454
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
7959
Time Spy5228211
Solar Bay215235563
Port Royal3084627
Fire Strike180521866
Night Raid758484235
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 610M
5099
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
81436
Background Blur12 frames/s141.4 frames/s
Face Detection6.42 frames/s84.1 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.16 Gpix/sec3.07 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.23 Gpix/sec3.91 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.16 Gpix/sec3.85 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.07 Gpix/sec1.1 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching18.2 Gpix/sec325.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics828.6 fps11008.8 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 610M
1618
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
14434
G2D Mark526630
DirectX 1116 fps130 fps
DirectX 126 fps61 fps
GPU Compute702 Ops/s5961 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 610M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
99.7 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a597.7 fps
Car Chasen/a531.2 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a416.7 fps
T-Rexn/a2221.6 fps
ALU 2n/a2915 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a258.8 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a2946.5

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced October, 1, 2022 February, 22, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ada Lovelace
Codename Mendocino AD107 (GN21-X2)

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 1140-2070 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1900-2200 MHz 1605-2370 MHz
Shader Units 128 2560
TMUs 8 80
ROPs 4 32
Execution Units 2 20
Ray Tracing Cores 2 20
Tensor Cores n/a 80
L1 cache 128 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 2000 KB/core 12000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 Gpix/sec 51-76 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTex/s 128-190 GTex/s
FLOPS 0.5-0.6 TFLOPS 8.2-12.1 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 15 W 35-140 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 6 nm 5 nm
Transistor Size 122 mm² 156 mm²
Transistor count 3.4 billion 18.9 billion
Transistor density 27.87 MTr/mm² 121.15 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 2000 MHz
Bus n/a 96 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 16000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 6 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon 610M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
192 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 8.9
DisplayPort n/a 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 3

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below