AMD Radeon 610M vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 610M, vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 610M and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
39
31
19
10
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
15
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
16
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
19
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
35
31
18
9
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a33
1080p Ultran/a24
1440p Ultran/a16
4K Ultran/a-
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 610M
454
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spy5222781
Solar Bay215211162
Port Royal3081580
Fire Strike18057824
Night Raid758433611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 610M
5099
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blur12 frames/s86.4 frames/s
Face Detection6.42 frames/s35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.16 Gpix/sec1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.23 Gpix/sec1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.16 Gpix/sec1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.07 Gpix/sec0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching18.2 Gpix/sec132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics828.6 fps4470.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 610M
1618
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Mark526878
DirectX 1116 fps67 fps
DirectX 126 fps31 fps
GPU Compute702 Ops/s3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 610M
n/a
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a183.4 fps
Car Chasen/a202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a161.6 fps
T-Rexn/a699.9 fps
ALU 2n/a849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a268.9 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a1373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced October, 1, 2022 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 RDNA 3.0
Codename Mendocino Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1900-2200 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 128 768
TMUs 8 48
ROPs 4 32
Execution Units 2 12
Ray Tracing Cores 2 12
L1 cache 128 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 2000 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 0.5-0.6 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 6 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size 122 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 3.4 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 27.87 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort n/a 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below