AMD Radeon 660M vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 660M, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 660M and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
27
13
11
n/a
67
38
28
14
The Witcher 3
10
12
n/a
n/a
49
41
28
14
Counter-Strike 2
24
18
12
n/a
89
60
39
16
Far Cry 6
22
18
10
n/a
51
46
31
15
Hogwarts Legacy
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
30
21
16
9
COD Modern Warfare 3
20
16
13
n/a
37
30
21
14
Ghost of Tsushima
12
9
n/a
n/a
28
20
14
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
9
10
n/a
n/a
30
26
17
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
14
11
n/a
55
49
32
18
Avg FPS
1080p High1748
1080p Ultra1337
1440p Ultra925
4K Ultra-13
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 660M
1350
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3956
Time Spy15323908
Solar Bay622719003
Port Royal613413
Fire Strike490610196
Night Raid2019645167
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 660M
14065
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
42967
Background Blur36 frames/s73.3 frames/s
Face Detection16.4 frames/s39.7 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.48 Gpix/sec1.65 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.65 Gpix/sec2.13 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.53 Gpix/sec2.06 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.18 Gpix/sec0.55 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching46.5 Gpix/sec191.1 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2056.5 fps5921.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 660M
4461
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
7774
G2D Mark701481
DirectX 1192 fps48 fps
DirectX 1245 fps42 fps
GPU Compute1972 Ops/s3639 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 660M
18.1 fps
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
51 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)109.1 fps262.9 fps
Car Chase106.4 fps255.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)87.7 fps207.6 fps
T-Rex368.5 fps950.2 fps
ALU 2451.3 fps1377.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2170.1 fps232.9 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation320.91502.2

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 1, 2022 December, 17, 2021
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ampere
Codename Rembrandt GA107

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 735-1185 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800-1900 MHz 1245-1477 MHz
Shader Units 384 2048
TMUs 24 64
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units 6 16
Ray Tracing Cores 6 32
Tensor Cores n/a 64
L1 cache 128 KB/core 64 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 29-30 Gpix/sec 40-47 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 43-46 GTex/s 80-95 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS 5.1-6 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
TGP 15 W 30-45 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 6 nm 8 nm
Transistor Size 208 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor count 13.1 billion 8 billion
Transistor density 62.98 MTr/mm² 40 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1750 MHz
Bus n/a 64 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 14000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 4 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon 660M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
112 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 8.6
DisplayPort n/a 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below