AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 660M, vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 660M and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
27
13
11
n/a
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
10
12
n/a
n/a
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
24
18
12
n/a
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
22
18
10
n/a
39
31
19
10
Hogwarts Legacy
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
15
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
20
16
13
n/a
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
12
9
n/a
n/a
20
16
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
9
10
n/a
n/a
20
19
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
14
11
n/a
35
31
18
9
Avg FPS
1080p High1733
1080p Ultra1324
1440p Ultra916
4K Ultra--
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 660M
1350
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spy15322781
Solar Bay622711162
Port Royal6131580
Fire Strike49067824
Night Raid2019633611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 660M
14065
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blur36 frames/s86.4 frames/s
Face Detection16.4 frames/s35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.48 Gpix/sec1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.65 Gpix/sec1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.53 Gpix/sec1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.18 Gpix/sec0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching46.5 Gpix/sec132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2056.5 fps4470.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 660M
4461
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Mark701878
DirectX 1192 fps67 fps
DirectX 1245 fps31 fps
GPU Compute1972 Ops/s3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 660M
18.1 fps
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)109.1 fps183.4 fps
Car Chase106.4 fps202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)87.7 fps161.6 fps
T-Rex368.5 fps699.9 fps
ALU 2451.3 fps849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2170.1 fps268.9 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation320.91373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 1, 2022 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 RDNA 3.0
Codename Rembrandt Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800-1900 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 384 768
TMUs 24 48
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units 6 12
Ray Tracing Cores 6 12
L1 cache 128 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 29-30 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 43-46 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 6 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size 208 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 13.1 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 62.98 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort n/a 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
2 (100%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below