AMD Radeon 8040S vs AMD Radeon 890M

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 8040S, vs AMD Radeon 890M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 8040S and AMD Radeon 890M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
58
31
27
14
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
36
28
15
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
53
34
24
10
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
46
36
23
12
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
25
19
15
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
40
34
22
15
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
24
19
12
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
26
21
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
42
37
25
12
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a39
1080p Ultran/a29
1440p Ultran/a19
4K Ultran/a10
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 8040S
n/a
AMD Radeon 890M
3224
Time Spyn/a3373
Solar Bayn/a14769
Port Royaln/a1820
Fire Striken/a9007
Night Raidn/a39135
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 8040S
35976
AMD Radeon 890M
42932
Background Blur106.8 frames/s98.6 frames/s
Face Detection43.8 frames/s42 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.12 Gpix/sec1.25 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.17 Gpix/sec1.6 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.07 Gpix/sec1.69 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.5 Gpix/sec0.55 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching163 Gpix/sec214.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5820.4 fps7757.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 8040S
n/a
AMD Radeon 890M
8470
G2D Markn/a1006
DirectX 11n/a77 fps
DirectX 12n/a37 fps
GPU Computen/a4421 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 8040S
n/a
AMD Radeon 890M
39.7 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a197.2 fps
Car Chasen/a229.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a189.7 fps
T-Rexn/a754.1 fps
ALU 2n/a906.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a251.3 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a1577.3

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 7, 2025 June, 3, 2024
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.5 RDNA 3+
Codename Strix Halo Strix Point

GPU

GPU Frequency n/a 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2800 MHz 2900 MHz
Shader Units 1024 1024
TMUs 64 64
ROPs 32 40
Execution Units 16 16
Ray Tracing Cores 16 16
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 4 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 90 Gpix/sec 116 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 179 GTex/s 186 GTex/s
FLOPS 11.5 TFLOPS 5.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 45-120 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 4 nm 4 nm
Max temperature 100 °C 100 °C
Transistor Size n/a 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort 2.1a 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below