AMD Radeon 840M vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
34
out 100
VS
16
out 100
Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 840M, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 54 31 23 14 |
 The Witcher 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 41 35 22 11 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 74 54 35 13 |
 Far Cry 6 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 44 42 28 14 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 24 20 14 n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 37 31 18 12 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 24 18 13 n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 26 22 13 n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 47 42 27 14 |
| 1080p High | n/a | 41 |
| 1080p Ultra | n/a | 33 |
| 1440p Ultra | n/a | 21 |
| 4K Ultra | n/a | 11 |
| Deviation | n/a | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | n/a | 3565 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 12312 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 9684 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 46016 |
| Background Blur | n/a | 66.4 frames/s |
| Face Detection | n/a | 43.3 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | n/a | 1.51 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | n/a | 1.68 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | n/a | 1.87 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | n/a | 0.49 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | n/a | 187.9 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | n/a | 5261.5 fps |
| API | n/a | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | n/a | 565 |
| DirectX 11 | n/a | 58 fps |
| DirectX 12 | n/a | 35 fps |
| GPU Compute | n/a | 3058 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | n/a | 251.1 fps |
| Car Chase | n/a | 240.5 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | n/a | 200.6 fps |
| T-Rex | n/a | 931.9 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 1021.5 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 270.6 fps |
| API | n/a | OpenGL |
| OS | n/a | Windows |
| Tessellation | n/a | 1151.2 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | AMD | Nvidia |
| Build | Integrated | Discrete |
| Announced | January, 7, 2025 | April, 23, 2019 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | PC use |
| Use case | Universal | Gaming |
| Segment | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Turing |
| Codename | Krackan Point | TU117 |
| Price | n/a | 149 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1485 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2900 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Shader Units | 256 | 896 |
| TMUs | 16 | 56 |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 4 | 14 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 4 | No |
| Tensor Cores | n/a | No |
| L1 cache | n/a | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | n/a | 1024 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 4 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 23 Gpix/sec | 53 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 46 GTex/s | 93 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 3 TFLOPS | 3 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TGP | 15-54 W | 75 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Max temperature | 100 °C | n/a |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 200 mm² |
| Transistor count | n/a | 4 billion |
| Transistor density | n/a | 20 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2001 MHz |
| Bus | n/a | 128 bit |
| ECC support | n/a | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | n/a | 8000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | n/a | 4 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | n/a | 7.5 |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | No |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider AMD Radeon 840M the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
