AMD Radeon 840M vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 840M, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 840M and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
113
67
58
41
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
125
97
72
40
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
181
136
95
47
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
92
85
67
36
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
67
54
41
19
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
79
71
49
33
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
63
47
38
21
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
69
63
35
16
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
106
100
69
37
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a99
1080p Ultran/a80
1440p Ultran/a58
4K Ultran/a32
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
8493
Time Spyn/a9086
Solar Bayn/a39825
Port Royaln/a5193
Fire Striken/a23209
Night Raidn/a92188
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
97923
Background Blurn/a200 frames/s
Face Detectionn/a106.8 frames/s
Horizon Detectionn/a3.73 Gpix/sec
Edge Detectionn/a4.57 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blurn/a4.84 Gpix/sec
Feature Matchingn/a1.07 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matchingn/a452 Gpix/sec
Particle Physicsn/a11141.9 fps
APIn/aOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
16119
G2D Markn/a819
DirectX 11n/a129 fps
DirectX 12n/a60 fps
GPU Computen/a6446 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
100.2 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a538.5 fps
Car Chasen/a455.5 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a405.2 fps
T-Rexn/a1996.1 fps
ALU 2n/a2485.9 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a258.9 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a2579.1

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 7, 2025 October, 17, 2018
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Turing
Codename Krackan Point TU106
Price n/a 599

GPU

GPU Frequency n/a 1410 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2900 MHz 1620 MHz
Shader Units 256 2304
TMUs 16 144
ROPs 8 64
Execution Units 4 36
Ray Tracing Cores 4 36
Tensor Cores n/a 288
L1 cache n/a 64 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 4000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 4 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23 Gpix/sec 104 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 46 GTex/s 233 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 7.5 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 15-54 W 175 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 4 nm 12 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 445 mm²
Transistor count n/a 10 billion
Transistor density n/a 22.47 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1750 MHz
Bus n/a 256 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 14000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 8 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
448 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 7.5
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 2

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below