AMD Radeon 840M vs Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 840M, vs Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 840M and Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
152
100
90
66
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
172
146
104
55
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
248
193
137
81
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
133
121
100
61
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
102
82
65
32
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
128
116
87
57
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
92
77
61
36
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
109
97
64
31
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
175
158
117
65
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a146
1080p Ultran/a121
1440p Ultran/a92
4K Ultran/a54
Deviationn/aHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada
14565
Time Spyn/a14415
Solar Bayn/a66759
Port Royaln/a8898
Fire Striken/a37277
Night Raidn/a158480
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada
151680
Background Blurn/a235.3 frames/s
Face Detectionn/a157.9 frames/s
Horizon Detectionn/a5.53 Gpix/sec
Edge Detectionn/a7.44 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blurn/a7.87 Gpix/sec
Feature Matchingn/a1.58 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matchingn/a737.7 Gpix/sec
Particle Physicsn/a22409.2 fps
APIn/aOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada
23734
G2D Markn/a1102
DirectX 11n/a208 fps
DirectX 12n/a98 fps
GPU Computen/a11971 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada
132.2 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a731.5 fps
Car Chasen/a715.5 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a572.7 fps
T-Rexn/a2821.6 fps
ALU 2n/a4489.8 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a141.8 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a4685.1

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 7, 2025 August, 9, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level High-end
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Ada Lovelace
Codename Krackan Point AD104
Price n/a 1250

GPU

GPU Frequency n/a 1500 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2900 MHz 2175 MHz
Shader Units 256 6144
TMUs 16 192
ROPs 8 80
Execution Units 4 48
Ray Tracing Cores 4 48
Tensor Cores n/a 192
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 48000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 4 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23 Gpix/sec 174 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 46 GTex/s 418 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 26.7 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 15-54 W 130 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 4 nm 5 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 294 mm²
Transistor count n/a 35 billion
Transistor density n/a 119.05 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 2250 MHz
Bus n/a 160 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 18000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 20 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada
360 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 8.9
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 3

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below