AMD Radeon RX 560 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon RX 560, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon RX 560 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
34
17
15
n/a
71
43
32
21
The Witcher 3
15
15
9
n/a
63
50
31
18
Counter-Strike 2
33
19
15
n/a
105
72
48
19
Far Cry 6
28
19
13
n/a
57
49
35
19
Hogwarts Legacy
13
11
n/a
n/a
34
27
22
11
COD Modern Warfare 3
26
22
17
9
41
36
25
18
Ghost of Tsushima
13
9
n/a
n/a
31
21
20
10
Cyberpunk 2077
12
10
n/a
n/a
34
32
19
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
23
19
13
n/a
60
54
35
17
Avg FPS
1080p High2255
1080p Ultra1643
1440p Ultra1130
4K Ultra-16
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon RX 560
1769
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4388
Time Spy18574693
Fire Strike649512258
Night Raid2551059938
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon RX 560
19139
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
57455
Background Blur34 frames/s106.6 frames/s
Face Detection17.6 frames/s58.3 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.69 Gpix/sec1.98 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.43 Gpix/sec2.67 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.15 Gpix/sec2.79 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.2 Gpix/sec0.75 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching65.5 Gpix/sec248.2 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2232.5 fps7783.2 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 560
3657
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
10176
G2D Mark487750
DirectX 1124 fps73 fps
DirectX 1220 fps44 fps
GPU Compute1449 Ops/s4516 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon RX 560
25.5 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
54.3 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)144.3 fps305.2 fps
Car Chasen/a280 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a260.1 fps
T-Rexn/a1232.9 fps
ALU 2n/a1419.9 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a284.6 fps
APIVulkanOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellationn/a1564.4

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced April, 18, 2017 April, 23, 2019
Form Factor PC use PC use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture GCN 4.0 Turing
Codename Polaris 21 TU116
Price 99 159

GPU

GPU Frequency 1175 MHz 1530 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1275 MHz 1725 MHz
Shader Units 1024 1280
TMUs 64 80
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units n/a 20
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 16 KB/core 64 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 20 Gpix/sec 55 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 82 GTex/s 138 GTex/s
FLOPS 2.6 TFLOPS 4.4 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 75 W 100 W
Process GlobalFoundries TSMC
Process tech. 14 nm 12 nm
Transistor Size 123 mm² 284 mm²
Transistor count 3 billion 6 billion
Transistor density 24.39 MTr/mm² 21.13 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR5 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 1750 MHz 2001 MHz
Bus 128 bit 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 7000 MB/s 8000 MB/s
Memory Size 4 GB 4 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon RX 560
112 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
192 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 7.5
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
2 (100%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below