AMD Radeon RX 570 vs Nvidia GeForce MX250

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon RX 570, vs Nvidia GeForce MX250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon RX 570 and Nvidia GeForce MX250
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
65
37
28
17
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
44
38
19
10
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
62
46
33
12
30
17
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
51
44
30
15
15
17
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
27
20
15
n/a
13
10
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
44
38
24
15
25
21
13
9
Ghost of Tsushima
28
20
14
n/a
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
27
27
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
51
45
26
13
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High4414
1080p Ultra3510
1440p Ultra22-
4K Ultra11-
DeviationLowHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon RX 570
3694
Nvidia GeForce MX250
995
Time Spy38541078
Fire Strike134443623
Night Raid5038314668
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon RX 570
37147
Nvidia GeForce MX250
10870
Background Blur55.7 frames/s27.8 frames/s
Face Detection31.3 frames/s13 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.41 Gpix/sec0.4 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection2.82 Gpix/sec0.59 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.57 Gpix/sec0.64 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.31 Gpix/sec0.12 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching143.2 Gpix/sec34 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics5080.1 fps960.9 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 570
7968
Nvidia GeForce MX250
2392
G2D Mark724239
DirectX 1155 fps18 fps
DirectX 1239 fps12 fps
GPU Compute2965 Ops/s1005 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon RX 570
48.9 fps
Nvidia GeForce MX250
16.4 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)274.6 fps90.3 fps
Car Chase259.3 fps84.2 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)219 fps74.1 fps
T-Rex1018.3 fps311.5 fps
ALU 21061.7 fps334.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2150.4 fps188.8 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation795.9408

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced April, 18, 2017 February, 21, 2009
Form Factor PC use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture GCN 4.0 Pascal
Codename Polaris 20 GP108
Price 169 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 1168 MHz 1519 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1244 MHz 1582 MHz
Shader Units 2048 384
TMUs 128 24
ROPs 32 16
Execution Units n/a 3
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 16 KB/core 48 KB/core
L2 cache 2000 KB/core 512 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 40 Gpix/sec 25 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 159 GTex/s 38 GTex/s
FLOPS 5.1 TFLOPS 1.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x4
TGP 150 W 25 W
Process GlobalFoundries Samsung
Process tech. 14 nm 14 nm
Transistor Size 232 mm² 74 mm²
Transistor count 5 billion 1.8 billion
Transistor density 21.55 MTr/mm² 24.32 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory Frequency 1750 MHz 1502 MHz
Bus 256 bit 64 bit
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed 7000 MB/s 6000 MB/s
Memory Size 4 GB 2 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon RX 570
224 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce MX250
48 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 6.1
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below