AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon RX 6600, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon RX 6600 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
140
81
66
45
54
31
23
14
The Witcher 3
125
108
74
38
41
35
22
11
Counter-Strike 2
202
142
96
52
74
54
35
13
Far Cry 6
110
98
73
42
44
42
28
14
Hogwarts Legacy
76
62
47
22
24
20
14
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
103
95
66
42
37
31
18
12
Ghost of Tsushima
80
63
45
23
24
18
13
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
80
71
42
18
26
22
13
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
137
118
85
39
47
42
27
14
Avg FPS
1080p High11741
1080p Ultra9333
1440p Ultra6621
4K Ultra3611
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon RX 6600
10197
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
3419
Time Spy104233565
Solar Bay4497312312
Port Royal5820n/a
Fire Strike264789684
Night Raid9851446016
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon RX 6600
58048
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
39481
Background Blur104.1 frames/s66.4 frames/s
Face Detection79.7 frames/s43.3 frames/s
Horizon Detection2.05 Gpix/sec1.51 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection2.61 Gpix/sec1.68 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.59 Gpix/sec1.87 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.64 Gpix/sec0.49 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching257.8 Gpix/sec187.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics7635.3 fps5261.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 6600
15100
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
7880
G2D Mark881565
DirectX 11152 fps58 fps
DirectX 1251 fps35 fps
GPU Compute6706 Ops/s3058 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon RX 6600
96.4 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
47.5 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)567.8 fps251.1 fps
Car Chasen/a240.5 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)427.9 fps200.6 fps
T-Rex1906.1 fps931.9 fps
ALU 22284.3 fps1021.5 fps
Driver Overhead 2600 fps270.6 fps
APIMetalOpenGL
OSOS XWindows
Tessellationn/a1151.2

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced October, 13, 2021 April, 23, 2019
Form Factor PC use PC use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Codename Navi 23 TU117
Price 329 149

GPU

GPU Frequency 1626 MHz 1485 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2491 MHz 1665 MHz
Shader Units 1792 896
TMUs 112 56
ROPs 64 32
Execution Units n/a 14
Ray Tracing Cores 28 No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 128 KB/core 64 KB/core
L2 cache 2000 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 159 Gpix/sec 53 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 279 GTex/s 93 GTex/s
FLOPS 8.9 TFLOPS 3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 132 W 75 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 7 nm 12 nm
Transistor Size 237 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor count 11 billion 4 billion
Transistor density 46.41 MTr/mm² 20 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory Frequency 1750 MHz 2001 MHz
Bus 128 bit 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 14000 MB/s 8000 MB/s
Memory Size 8 GB 4 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon RX 6600
224 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
128.1 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 7.5
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider AMD Radeon RX 6600 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below