Apple M4 GPU (8-core) vs Nvidia RTX A4500 Laptop

Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 GPU (8-core), vs Nvidia RTX A4500 Laptop. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Apple M4 GPU (8-core) and Nvidia RTX A4500 Laptop
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
115
71
61
40
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
128
102
76
40
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
191
138
101
50
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
96
86
69
38
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
57
42
23
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
84
77
54
37
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
65
50
37
21
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
72
63
36
17
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
112
103
74
37
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a104
1080p Ultran/a83
1440p Ultran/a61
4K Ultran/a34
Deviationn/aHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Apple M4 GPU (8-core)
3341
Nvidia RTX A4500 Laptop
9037
Time Spyn/a9382
Solar Bayn/a37670
Port Royaln/a6310
Fire Striken/a26135
Night Raidn/a65181
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Apple M4 GPU (8-core)
31734
Nvidia RTX A4500 Laptop
119474
Background Blurn/a158.7 frames/s
Face Detectionn/a115.8 frames/s
Horizon Detectionn/a5.95 Gpix/sec
Edge Detectionn/a8.2 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blurn/a5.85 Gpix/sec
Feature Matchingn/a1.13 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matchingn/a505.2 Gpix/sec
Particle Physicsn/a15517.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Apple M4 GPU (8-core)
n/a
Nvidia RTX A4500 Laptop
16932
G2D Markn/a710
DirectX 11n/a133 fps
DirectX 12n/a78 fps
GPU Computen/a6783 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Apple M4 GPU (8-core)
n/a
Nvidia RTX A4500 Laptop
96.2 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a532.9 fps
Car Chasen/a505.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a426.2 fps
T-Rexn/a2005.3 fps
ALU 2n/a2266.3 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a235.4 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a2737

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Apple Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced October, 29, 2024 March, 22, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Professional Professional
Segment Mid-range High-end
Architecture Apple M GPU Ampere
Codename Custom GA104

GPU

GPU Frequency 500 MHz 510-1035 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800 MHz 1035-1485 MHz
Shader Units 1024 5888
TMUs 64 184
ROPs 32 96
Execution Units 128 46
Ray Tracing Cores n/a 46
Tensor Cores n/a 184
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 4000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 58 Gpix/sec 99-143 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 115 GTex/s 190-273 GTex/s
FLOPS 3.7 TFLOPS 12.2-17.5 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Custom PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 15 W 80-140 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 3 nm 8 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 392 mm²
Transistor count 28 billion 17.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 44.39 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency 7500 MHz 2000 MHz
Bus 128 bit 256 bit
ECC support No Yes
Effective Memory Speed 15000 MB/s 16000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 16 GB
Max Throughput
Apple M4 GPU (8-core)
120 GB/s
Nvidia RTX A4500 Laptop
512 GB/s

API

DirectX n/a 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL n/a 4.6
CUDA n/a 8.6
DisplayPort n/a 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia RTX A4500 Laptop the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below