Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
71
43
32
21
21
12
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
63
50
31
18
16
13
9
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
105
72
48
19
38
22
15
n/a
Far Cry 6
57
49
35
19
24
25
15
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
34
27
22
11
15
11
10
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
41
36
25
18
29
24
14
11
Ghost of Tsushima
31
21
20
10
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
34
32
19
n/a
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
60
54
35
17
23
16
12
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High5521
1080p Ultra4315
1440p Ultra3011
4K Ultra16-
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4388
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
1831
Time Spy46931735
Fire Strike122586771
Night Raid5993827045
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
57455
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
20580
Background Blur106.6 frames/s52.5 frames/s
Face Detection58.3 frames/s24.9 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.98 Gpix/sec0.79 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection2.67 Gpix/sec1.16 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.79 Gpix/sec1.25 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.75 Gpix/sec0.2 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching248.2 Gpix/sec65.5 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics7783.2 fps1832.4 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
10176
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
5028
G2D Mark750457
DirectX 1173 fps38 fps
DirectX 1244 fps20 fps
GPU Compute4516 Ops/s2089 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
54.3 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
30 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)305.2 fps174.9 fps
Car Chase280 fps160.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)260.1 fps143.1 fps
T-Rex1232.9 fps650.7 fps
ALU 21419.9 fps631.8 fps
Driver Overhead 2284.6 fps231 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1564.4759.5

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced April, 23, 2019 October, 25, 2016
Form Factor PC use PC use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Turing Pascal
Codename TU116 GP107
Price 159 109

GPU

GPU Frequency 1530 MHz 1354 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1725 MHz 1455 MHz
Shader Units 1280 640
TMUs 80 40
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 20 5
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 64 KB/core 48 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 55 Gpix/sec 47 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 138 GTex/s 58 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.4 TFLOPS 1.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 100 W 75 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 12 nm 14 nm
Transistor Size 284 mm² 132 mm²
Transistor count 6 billion 3 billion
Transistor density 21.13 MTr/mm² 22.73 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory Frequency 2001 MHz 1752 MHz
Bus 128 bit 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 8000 MB/s 7000 MB/s
Memory Size 4 GB 2 GB
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
192 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
112.1 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 7.5 6.1
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below