Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
16
out 100
VS
33
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 54 31 23 14 | 106 65 53 35 |
 The Witcher 3 | 41 35 22 11 | 115 92 65 34 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 74 54 35 13 | 167 123 90 42 |
 Far Cry 6 | 44 42 28 14 | 86 80 61 33 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 24 20 14 n/a | 63 53 35 18 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 37 31 18 12 | 75 65 45 32 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 24 18 13 n/a | 60 47 33 20 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 26 22 13 n/a | 64 56 34 15 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 47 42 27 14 | 98 89 62 33 |
| 1080p High | 41 | 93 |
| 1080p Ultra | 33 | 74 |
| 1440p Ultra | 21 | 53 |
| 4K Ultra | 11 | 29 |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 3565 | 8211 |
| Solar Bay | 12312 | 35563 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 4627 |
| Fire Strike | 9684 | 21866 |
| Night Raid | 46016 | 84235 |
| Background Blur | 66.4 frames/s | 141.4 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 43.3 frames/s | 84.1 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 1.51 Gpix/sec | 3.07 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.68 Gpix/sec | 3.91 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.87 Gpix/sec | 3.85 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.49 Gpix/sec | 1.1 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 187.9 Gpix/sec | 325.9 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 5261.5 fps | 11008.8 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 565 | 630 |
| DirectX 11 | 58 fps | 130 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 35 fps | 61 fps |
| GPU Compute | 3058 Ops/s | 5961 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 251.1 fps | 597.7 fps |
| Car Chase | 240.5 fps | 531.2 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 200.6 fps | 416.7 fps |
| T-Rex | 931.9 fps | 2221.6 fps |
| ALU 2 | 1021.5 fps | 2915 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 270.6 fps | 258.8 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 1151.2 | 2946.5 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | April, 23, 2019 | February, 22, 2023 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | TU117 | AD107 (GN21-X2) |
| Price | 149 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1485 MHz | 1140-2070 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1665 MHz | 1605-2370 MHz |
| Shader Units | 896 | 2560 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 14 | 20 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | No | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | No | 80 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB/core | 12000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 53 Gpix/sec | 51-76 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 93 GTex/s | 128-190 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 3 TFLOPS | 8.2-12.1 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 75 W | 35-140 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | 200 mm² | 156 mm² |
| Transistor count | 4 billion | 18.9 billion |
| Transistor density | 20 MTr/mm² | 121.15 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | 2001 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Bus | 128 bit | 96 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 8000 MB/s | 16000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
