Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
22
out 100
VS
45
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 89 50 41 26 | 151 98 85 64 |
 The Witcher 3 | 85 64 45 23 | 171 141 104 55 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 132 94 65 32 | 241 195 134 78 |
 Far Cry 6 | 72 61 50 23 | 131 119 95 56 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 46 35 25 14 | 97 81 60 33 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 55 46 33 23 | 120 116 81 53 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 44 32 24 12 | 88 74 57 31 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 43 43 25 9 | 105 93 60 26 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 79 71 46 25 | 164 151 112 59 |
| 1080p High | 72 | 141 |
| 1080p Ultra | 55 | 119 |
| 1440p Ultra | 39 | 88 |
| 4K Ultra | 21 | 51 |
| Deviation | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 5856 | 13641 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 64184 |
| Port Royal | 3250 | 8309 |
| Fire Strike | 19506 | 34034 |
| Night Raid | 70001 | 120956 |
| Background Blur | 134.8 frames/s | 161.6 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 59.8 frames/s | 117.2 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 2.37 Gpix/sec | 5.89 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 3.79 Gpix/sec | 8.05 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 3.46 Gpix/sec | 6.65 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.22 Gpix/sec | 1.25 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 191.9 Gpix/sec | 550.6 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 4183.6 fps | 17613.1 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 853 | 998 |
| DirectX 11 | 106 fps | 181 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 55 fps | 85 fps |
| GPU Compute | 6126 Ops/s | 11282 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 391.3 fps | 856 fps |
| Car Chase | 375.2 fps | 668 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 337.9 fps | 592.9 fps |
| T-Rex | 1867.7 fps | 3078.4 fps |
| ALU 2 | 1803.6 fps | 4531.5 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 264 fps | 283 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 2238.8 | 4563.3 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | June, 2, 2015 | October, 22, 2020 |
| Form Factor | PC use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | High-end | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Codename | GM200 | GA104 |
| Price | 649 | 499 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1076 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Shader Units | 2816 | 5888 |
| TMUs | 176 | 184 |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| Execution Units | 22 | 46 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | No | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | No | 184 |
| L1 cache | 48 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 3000 KB/core | 4000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 103 Gpix/sec | 166 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 189 GTex/s | 317 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 6.1 TFLOPS | 20.3 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 250 W | 220 W |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Process tech. | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistor Size | 601 mm² | 392 mm² |
| Transistor count | 8 billion | 17 billion |
| Transistor density | 13.31 MTr/mm² | 43.37 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | 1753 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Bus | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 7000 MB/s | 14000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 8.6 |
| DisplayPort | 1.2 | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 2 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
