Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 vs AMD Radeon 680M

Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070, vs AMD Radeon 680M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 and AMD Radeon 680M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
170
113
105
79
42
23
17
10
The Witcher 3
191
160
114
61
19
21
10
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
262
207
148
82
39
23
20
n/a
Far Cry 6
148
135
112
71
33
27
19
9
Hogwarts Legacy
120
96
78
43
18
12
9
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
154
141
110
72
27
24
19
10
Ghost of Tsushima
104
87
74
40
19
11
9
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
133
115
78
34
19
15
10
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
209
194
148
81
25
24
17
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High16627
1080p Ultra13920
1440p Ultra10714
4K Ultra63-
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070
18116
AMD Radeon 680M
2194
Time Spy178252337
Solar Bay8264510075
Port Royal111491022
Fire Strike441096948
Night Raid15258727970
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070
167522
AMD Radeon 680M
28675
Background Blur233 frames/s73.8 frames/s
Face Detection141.7 frames/s30.1 frames/s
Horizon Detection6.62 Gpix/sec0.93 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection9.19 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur9.2 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching1.78 Gpix/sec0.37 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching845.4 Gpix/sec105 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics25043.9 fps4640 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070
26962
AMD Radeon 680M
4668
G2D Mark1165751
DirectX 11245 fps45 fps
DirectX 12102 fps22 fps
GPU Compute14820 Ops/s2163 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070
192 fps
AMD Radeon 680M
27.3 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)1039 fps142 fps
Car Chase900 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)761.2 fpsn/a
T-Rex3848.1 fpsn/a
ALU 25980.8 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2296.7 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLVulkan
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation6200.7n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Nvidia AMD
Build Discrete Integrated
Announced April, 13, 2023 January, 1, 2022
Form Factor PC use Laptop use
Use case Gaming Universal
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Ada Lovelace RDNA 2.0
Codename AD104 Rembrandt
Price 599 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 1920 MHz 400 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2475 MHz 2200-2400 MHz
Shader Units 5888 768
TMUs 184 48
ROPs 64 32
Execution Units 46 12
Ray Tracing Cores 46 12
Tensor Cores 184 n/a
L1 cache 128 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 36000 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 158 Gpix/sec 70-77 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 455 GTex/s 106-115 GTex/s
FLOPS 29.1 TFLOPS 3.4-3.7 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 200 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 6 nm
Transistor Size 294 mm² 208 mm²
Transistor count 35 billion 13.1 billion
Transistor density 119.05 MTr/mm² 62.98 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6X System Shared
Memory Frequency 1313 MHz n/a
Bus 192 bit n/a
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 21000 MB/s n/a
Memory Size 12 GB n/a
Max Throughput
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070
504.2 GB/s
AMD Radeon 680M
n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA 8.9 n/a
DisplayPort 1.4a n/a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below