AMD Radeon 610M vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 610M, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 610M and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
52
31
23
14
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
40
31
19
10
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
71
51
34
13
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
43
39
26
14
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
23
20
14
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
33
30
18
12
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
22
15
13
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
25
20
12
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
43
41
24
13
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a39
1080p Ultran/a31
1440p Ultran/a20
4K Ultran/a11
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 610M
454
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3247
Time Spy5223443
Solar Bay2152n/a
Port Royal3086905
Fire Strike18059305
Night Raid758440408
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 610M
5099
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
40588
Background Blur12 frames/s74.4 frames/s
Face Detection6.42 frames/s42 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.16 Gpix/sec1.47 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.23 Gpix/sec1.93 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.16 Gpix/sec1.81 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.07 Gpix/sec0.52 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching18.2 Gpix/sec187 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics828.6 fps5347.1 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 610M
1618
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
6968
G2D Mark526384
DirectX 1116 fps50 fps
DirectX 126 fps27 fps
GPU Compute702 Ops/s2750 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 610M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
47.5 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a251.1 fps
Car Chasen/a240.5 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a200.6 fps
T-Rexn/a931.9 fps
ALU 2n/a1021.5 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a270.6 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a1151.2

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced October, 1, 2022 April, 15, 2020
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Codename Mendocino TU117

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 1380 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1900-2200 MHz 1560 MHz
Shader Units 128 1024
TMUs 8 64
ROPs 4 32
Execution Units 2 16
Ray Tracing Cores 2 No
Tensor Cores n/a No
L1 cache 128 KB/core 64 KB/core
L2 cache 2000 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 Gpix/sec 50 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTex/s 100 GTex/s
FLOPS 0.5-0.6 TFLOPS 3.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 15 W 50 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 6 nm 12 nm
Transistor Size 122 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor count 3.4 billion 4.7 billion
Transistor density 27.87 MTr/mm² 23.5 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1500 MHz
Bus n/a 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 12000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 4 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon 610M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
192 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 7.5
DisplayPort n/a 1.4
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below