AMD Radeon 660M vs Nvidia GeForce MX250

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 660M, vs Nvidia GeForce MX250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 660M and Nvidia GeForce MX250
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
27
13
11
n/a
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
10
12
n/a
n/a
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
24
18
12
n/a
30
17
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
22
18
10
n/a
15
17
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
13
10
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
20
16
13
n/a
25
21
13
9
Ghost of Tsushima
12
9
n/a
n/a
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
9
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
14
11
n/a
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High1714
1080p Ultra1310
1440p Ultra9-
4K Ultra--
DeviationLowHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 660M
1350
Nvidia GeForce MX250
995
Time Spy15321078
Solar Bay6227n/a
Port Royal613n/a
Fire Strike49063623
Night Raid2019614668
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 660M
14065
Nvidia GeForce MX250
10870
Background Blur36 frames/s27.8 frames/s
Face Detection16.4 frames/s13 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.48 Gpix/sec0.4 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.65 Gpix/sec0.59 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.53 Gpix/sec0.64 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.18 Gpix/sec0.12 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching46.5 Gpix/sec34 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2056.5 fps960.9 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 660M
4461
Nvidia GeForce MX250
2392
G2D Mark701239
DirectX 1192 fps18 fps
DirectX 1245 fps12 fps
GPU Compute1972 Ops/s1005 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 660M
18.1 fps
Nvidia GeForce MX250
16.4 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)109.1 fps90.3 fps
Car Chase106.4 fps84.2 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)87.7 fps74.1 fps
T-Rex368.5 fps311.5 fps
ALU 2451.3 fps334.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2170.1 fps188.8 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation320.9408

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 1, 2022 February, 21, 2009
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Pascal
Codename Rembrandt GP108

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 1519 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800-1900 MHz 1582 MHz
Shader Units 384 384
TMUs 24 24
ROPs 16 16
Execution Units 6 3
Ray Tracing Cores 6 No
Tensor Cores n/a No
L1 cache 128 KB/core 48 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 512 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 29-30 Gpix/sec 25 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 43-46 GTex/s 38 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS 1.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x4
TGP 15 W 25 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 6 nm 14 nm
Transistor Size 208 mm² 74 mm²
Transistor count 13.1 billion 1.8 billion
Transistor density 62.98 MTr/mm² 24.32 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR5
Memory Frequency n/a 1502 MHz
Bus n/a 64 bit
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed n/a 6000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 2 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon 660M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce MX250
48 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 6.1
DisplayPort n/a 1.4
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below