AMD Radeon 660M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 660M, vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 660M and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
27
13
11
n/a
21
10
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
10
12
n/a
n/a
13
10
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
24
18
12
n/a
20
11
9
n/a
Far Cry 6
22
18
10
n/a
14
11
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
20
16
13
n/a
13
11
10
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
12
9
n/a
n/a
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
9
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
14
11
n/a
13
11
9
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High1713
1080p Ultra139
1440p Ultra9-
4K Ultra--
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 660M
1350
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
882
Time Spy15321291
Solar Bay6227n/a
Port Royal613n/a
Fire Strike49064470
Night Raid2019614228
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 660M
14065
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
17326
Background Blur36 frames/s34.5 frames/s
Face Detection16.4 frames/s27.4 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.48 Gpix/sec0.75 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.65 Gpix/sec1.11 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.53 Gpix/sec0.39 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.18 Gpix/sec0.18 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching46.5 Gpix/sec55.6 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2056.5 fps3061.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 660M
4461
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
n/a
G2D Mark701n/a
DirectX 1192 fpsn/a
DirectX 1245 fpsn/a
GPU Compute1972 Ops/sn/a
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 660M
18.1 fps
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
n/a
Aztec Ruins (Normal)109.1 fpsn/a
Car Chase106.4 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)87.7 fpsn/a
T-Rex368.5 fpsn/a
ALU 2451.3 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2170.1 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLn/a
OSWindowsn/a
Tessellation320.9n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 1, 2022 August, 15, 2020
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Generation 12.1
Codename Rembrandt Tiger Lake GT2

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800-1900 MHz 950-1550 MHz
Shader Units 384 768
TMUs 24 48
ROPs 16 24
Execution Units 6 96
Ray Tracing Cores 6 No
Tensor Cores n/a No
L1 cache 128 KB/core n/a
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 29-30 Gpix/sec 23-37 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 43-46 GTex/s 46-74 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS 1.5-2.4 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process TSMC Intel
Process tech. 6 nm 10 nm
Transistor Size 208 mm² 146 mm²
Transistor count 13.1 billion n/a
Transistor density 62.98 MTr/mm² n/a

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below