AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon 660M

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 680M, vs AMD Radeon 660M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 680M and AMD Radeon 660M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
42
23
17
10
27
13
11
n/a
The Witcher 3
19
21
10
n/a
10
12
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
39
23
20
n/a
24
18
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
33
27
19
9
22
18
10
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
18
12
9
n/a
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
27
24
19
10
20
16
13
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
19
11
9
n/a
12
9
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
19
15
10
n/a
9
10
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
25
24
17
n/a
15
14
11
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High2717
1080p Ultra2013
1440p Ultra149
4K Ultra--
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 680M
2194
AMD Radeon 660M
1350
Time Spy23371532
Solar Bay100756227
Port Royal1022613
Fire Strike69484906
Night Raid2797020196
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 680M
28675
AMD Radeon 660M
14065
Background Blur73.8 frames/s36 frames/s
Face Detection30.1 frames/s16.4 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.93 Gpix/sec0.48 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.17 Gpix/sec0.65 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.17 Gpix/sec0.53 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.37 Gpix/sec0.18 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching105 Gpix/sec46.5 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics4640 fps2056.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 680M
4668
AMD Radeon 660M
4461
G2D Mark751701
DirectX 1145 fps92 fps
DirectX 1222 fps45 fps
GPU Compute2163 Ops/s1972 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 680M
27.3 fps
AMD Radeon 660M
18.1 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)142 fps109.1 fps
Car Chasen/a106.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a87.7 fps
T-Rexn/a368.5 fps
ALU 2n/a451.3 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a170.1 fps
APIVulkanOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellationn/a320.9

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 1, 2022 January, 1, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 RDNA 2.0
Codename Rembrandt Rembrandt

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 400 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2200-2400 MHz 1800-1900 MHz
Shader Units 768 384
TMUs 48 24
ROPs 32 16
Execution Units 12 6
Ray Tracing Cores 12 6
L1 cache 128 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 70-77 Gpix/sec 29-30 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 106-115 GTex/s 43-46 GTex/s
FLOPS 3.4-3.7 TFLOPS 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 6 nm 6 nm
Transistor Size 208 mm² 208 mm²
Transistor count 13.1 billion 13.1 billion
Transistor density 62.98 MTr/mm² 62.98 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below